MCQOPTIONS
Saved Bookmarks
MCQOPTIONS
This section includes 657 Mcqs, each offering curated multiple-choice questions to sharpen your Testing Subject knowledge and support exam preparation. Choose a topic below to get started.
| 1. |
Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is conclusive proof of which relationship- |
| A. | from child maternity |
| B. | from both motherhood and paternity |
| C. | by child paternity |
| D. | when parents are unknown |
| Answer» D. when parents are unknown | |
| 2. |
Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act applies when the dispute is |
| A. | child motherhood |
| B. | be from the paternity of the child |
| C. | be on both (a) and (b) |
| D. | either from (a) or from (b) |
| Answer» C. be on both (a) and (b) | |
| 3. |
Possession is prima facie evidence of ownership, the principle has been described as- |
| A. | साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 109 |
| B. | साक्ष्य अधिनयम की धारा 111 |
| C. | साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 110 |
| D. | साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 112 |
| Answer» D. साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 112 | |
| 4. |
Which of the following does not come under the type of hypotheses? |
| A. | presumptions of fact |
| B. | presumptions of law |
| C. | hypothetical hypotheses |
| D. | mixed hypothesis of law and fact |
| Answer» D. mixed hypothesis of law and fact | |
| 5. |
If for seven years nothing has been heard of the person who has gone missing, among those who, if he were alive, must have heard, then the presumption arises that he has died. What will be the presumption as to the time of death of such person? |
| A. | It is the presumption that the person died on a date seven years after the last hearing |
| B. | It is the presumption that the person died at the beginning of the specified period between these seven years. |
| C. | Those who make this statement have to prove this fact. |
| D. | Presumption that the person died on the date of judicial pronouncement |
| Answer» C. Those who make this statement have to prove this fact. | |
| 6. |
A person shall be deemed to be dead if he has not been heard of— |
| A. | 5 वर्ष से |
| B. | 7 वर्ष से |
| C. | 10 वर्ष से |
| D. | 12 वर्ष से |
| Answer» C. 10 वर्ष से | |
| 7. |
Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer using the codes given below the Lists-List-I---------------------- ----------List-II (Provisions)----------------------(Sections of the Evidence Act) A. To prove Weight-------1. Section 106B. Burden of proving------- 2. Section 103 on whom. C. Burden of proving about particular fact---3. Section 102D. Knowledge -------4. Section-101 Burden of Proof |
| A. | A--B--C--Dn3--4--2--1 |
| B. | A--B--C--Dn2--3--4--1 |
| C. | A--B--C--Dn4--3--2--1 |
| D. | A--B--C--Dn1--2--3--4 |
| Answer» D. A--B--C--Dn1--2--3--4 | |
| 8. |
The illustrative case of Mohammad Sharif Vs Bande Ali is related to the following sections of the Indian Evidence Act: |
| A. | धारायें 101 एवं 102 |
| B. | धारायें 107 एवं 108 |
| C. | धारायें 112 एवं 113 |
| D. | धारायें 118 एवं 119 |
| Answer» C. धारायें 112 एवं 113 | |
| 9. |
The illustrative case of Muhammad Sharif Vs Bande Ali is related to the following sections of the Indian Evidence Act: |
| A. | धारा 102 |
| B. | धारा 104 |
| C. | धारा 106 |
| D. | धारा 108 |
| Answer» D. धारा 108 | |
| 10. |
Section 107 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872 provides for presumption in respect of |
| A. | life |
| B. | Death |
| C. | longevity |
| D. | theology |
| Answer» B. Death | |
| 11. |
Answer: The concept of living is described in- |
| A. | साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 106 में |
| B. | साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 107 में |
| C. | साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 108 में |
| D. | साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 109 में |
| Answer» C. साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 108 में | |
| 12. |
Under the continuance of life for thirty years, the burden of proof is given- |
| A. | साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 106 में |
| B. | साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 107 में |
| C. | साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 108 में |
| D. | साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 109 में |
| Answer» C. साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 108 में | |
| 13. |
According to section 107 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, when the question is whether a person is living or has died, the burden of proving that he has died is on the person who affirms him, if it is shown that Has it been known that he was alive within……? |
| A. | fifty years |
| B. | thirty years |
| C. | 20 years |
| D. | ten years |
| Answer» C. 20 years | |
| 14. |
Which section of the Indian Evidence Act deals with the principle of 'Sand ipsa locator'? |
| A. | धारा 102 |
| B. | धारा 104 |
| C. | धारा 106 |
| D. | धारा 108 |
| Answer» D. धारा 108 | |
| 15. |
Accused of murder that by reason of serious and sudden provocation he was possessed by power of self-control. Under the Evidence Act, the burden of proof is- |
| A. | on prosecution |
| B. | on the accused |
| C. | on the victim |
| D. | neither of the above |
| Answer» C. on the victim | |
| 16. |
Explaining any circumstances appearing in the evidence against him at a trial, the accused of committing murder states that due to grave and sudden provocation he was deprived of the power of self-restraint and that he inflicted an injury to A with a stick. brought that he died. To prove a serious and sudden provocation is- |
| A. | on prosecution |
| B. | research agency |
| C. | on court |
| D. | on the accused |
| Answer» E. | |
| 17. |
The duty to prove the plea of insanity is- |
| A. | on the accused |
| B. | on prosecution |
| C. | Civil surgeon to whom accused was referred for trial |
| D. | (a) and (c) both |
| Answer» B. on prosecution | |
| 18. |
'A' an accused of murder alleges that he was deprived of the power of self-control due to a serious and sudden provocation. 'B' denies the fact that- |
| A. | 'A' and 'B' have to share the burden of proof among themselves- |
| B. | The burden of proof is on 'B' |
| C. | The burden of proof is on the prosecution |
| D. | The burden of proof rests on 'A'. |
| Answer» E. | |
| 19. |
The case of the accused comes under the exceptions of the Penal Code. On whom is the burden of proving it? |
| A. | on the accused |
| B. | on prosecution |
| C. | on court |
| D. | on both the accused and the prosecution |
| Answer» B. on prosecution | |
| 20. |
accused of murder. His solicitor makes an explanation that he was not aware of the nature of his act because of his unsoundness of mind. In such case- |
| A. | The burden of proving (distortion of mind) will be on 'A' |
| B. | The burden of proving (in respect of unsoundness of mind) will be on the prosecution |
| C. | Prosecution has to prove that the accused is of sound mind |
| D. | Unsoundness of mind, unless it is refuted, must be presumed |
| Answer» B. The burden of proving (in respect of unsoundness of mind) will be on the prosecution | |
| 21. |
Section 105 of the Indian Evidence Act applies to- |
| A. | on criminal trials |
| B. | on civil litigants |
| C. | (both a and B |
| D. | none of the above |
| Answer» B. on civil litigants | |
| 22. |
'B' prosecutes 'A' for theft and wants the court to believe that 'B' has admitted the theft to 'C'. In such a case, who has to prove that 'B' admitted before 'C'? |
| A. | 'A' has to prove |
| B. | 'B' has to prove |
| C. | Either 'c' or 'a' can prove |
| D. | as the court directs |
| Answer» B. 'B' has to prove | |
| 23. |
'A' charges theft against 'B'. 'A' also stated that 'A' had committed theft in front of C. 'B' states that he had gone on a pilgrimage at the time of the alleged theft. Which one of the following statements is incorrect in this context- |
| A. | 'A' has to prove that 'B' did not go on pilgrimage on the day of theft |
| B. | 'A' has to prove that the goods confiscated from (B) belong to A |
| C. | 'A' has to prove that 'A' admitted to theft before C |
| D. | 'A' has to prove that 'B' has stolen his goods |
| Answer» B. 'A' has to prove that the goods confiscated from (B) belong to A | |
| 24. |
The burden of proving insanity is |
| A. | on prosecution |
| B. | on the accused |
| C. | on parents |
| D. | on the doctor taking care of the accused |
| Answer» C. on parents | |
| 25. |
he burden of proof in any suit or proceeding lies on the person who, failing to produce any evidence from either side, shall fail.This provision is contained in which section of the Indian Evidence Act? |
| A. | on 'y' |
| B. | on 'a' |
| C. | on the state |
| D. | On both 'A' and 'Y' |
| Answer» B. on 'a' | |
| 26. |
Which section of the Indian Evidence Act is not related to 'changing the weight of evidence'? |
| A. | धारा 101 |
| B. | धारा 102 |
| C. | धारा 105 |
| D. | धारा 108 |
| Answer» B. धारा 102 | |
| 27. |
Section 105 of the Indian Evidence Act is expected to apply to which of the following? |
| A. | in criminal trial |
| B. | in civil suit |
| C. | (a) and (b) both |
| D. | Neither (a) nor (b) |
| Answer» B. in civil suit | |
| 28. |
'A' wants to prove the dying statement made by 'B'. 'A' has to prove the death of 'B'. Which section of the Indian Evidence Act has such a provision? |
| A. | धारा 32(1) |
| B. | धारा 103 |
| C. | धारा 104 |
| D. | धारा 105 |
| Answer» D. धारा 105 | |
| 29. |
Specify the incorrect statement- |
| A. | 'A' wants the court to decide to punish 'B' for the offense which 'A' says 'B' has committed. |
| B. | 'B' prosecutes 'A' for theft and wants the court to believe that 'B' has admitted the theft to 'C'. 'A' has to prove this acceptance. |
| C. | 'A' wants to prove the dying statement made by 'B'. 'A' has to prove the death of 'B'. |
| D. | A accused of murder alleges that he was of unsound mind not knowing the nature of the act. The burden of proof that A was not of unsound mind is on the prosecution. |
| Answer» E. | |
| 30. |
According to which section of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the burden of proof in a suit or proceeding lies on the person who shall fail, if no evidence is given from either side? |
| A. | धारा 101 |
| B. | धारा 102 |
| C. | धारा 103 |
| D. | धारा 104 |
| Answer» C. धारा 103 | |
| 31. |
Of the following S.A. Under which is the correct analogy? |
| A. | सबूत का भार-धारा 101 |
| B. | दहोज मृत्यु-धारा 122 |
| C. | मूक साक्षी-धारा 107 |
| D. | सह-अपराधी-धारा 119 |
| Answer» B. दहोज मृत्यु-धारा 122 | |
| 32. |
In the possession of 'Firoz Bhai Cama's a plot of land was in Santa Cruz, 'Khudavad Vajandi' claim that he himself is entitled to that land which 'Firoz Bhai' Cama denies. 'Khuddad Vajandi' presents evidence in its support. But that evidence is not enough. Firoz Bhai is unable to produce any evidence. Which statement is correct in these circumstances- |
| A. | Khudadad Vajandi is entitled to get the decree, because he has produced some evidence |
| B. | Khudadad Vajandi is entitled to get the decree, as Firoz Cama has not produced any evidence |
| C. | Khudadad Vajandi is not entitled to receive the decree, as he has not borne the burden of proving the ownership |
| D. | Both Khudadad Vajandi and Firoz Bhai Cama are not entitled to that land, as neither of them has substantiated their claim. |
| Answer» D. Both Khudadad Vajandi and Firoz Bhai Cama are not entitled to that land, as neither of them has substantiated their claim. | |
| 33. |
The burden of evidence lies on the person- |
| A. | one who makes a negative claim of facts |
| B. | one who makes a positive claim of facts |
| C. | (both a and B |
| D. | none of the above |
| Answer» D. none of the above | |
| 34. |
Burden of proof- in criminal proceedings |
| A. | The burden is on the prosecution to convict the accused |
| B. | The burden is on the accused to prove his innocence |
| C. | on both sides |
| D. | depends on the facts of each case |
| Answer» B. The burden is on the accused to prove his innocence | |
| 35. |
Burden of production of evidence under section 102 of the Evidence Act- |
| A. | sometimes changes |
| B. | never changes |
| C. | constantly changes |
| D. | none of the above |
| Answer» D. none of the above | |
| 36. |
The primary burden of proving a fact in a criminal case is- |
| A. | on the accused |
| B. | on prosecution |
| C. | on the police |
| D. | on court |
| Answer» C. on the police | |
| 37. |
Burden of evidence under section 101 of the Indian Evidence Act- |
| A. | Changes during trial. |
| B. | never converts. |
| C. | may be changed. |
| D. | उक्त (1) व (3)दोनों सही हैं। |
| Answer» C. may be changed. | |
| 38. |
A sculptor 'A' agrees to sell all my idols to 'B'. 'A' also has a model and a tool. Will he be able to testify to show what he really wanted to sell? |
| A. | Yes |
| B. | No |
| C. | One has to make sense by looking at the precipice |
| D. | oral evidence will not be admissible |
| Answer» B. No | |
| 39. |
'A' has killed 'B'. 'A' is accused of murder. Who will be hit by the evidence in this case? |
| A. | on the state |
| B. | on 'a' |
| C. | On the legal representatives of 'B' |
| D. | (both a and B |
| Answer» B. on 'a' | |
| 40. |
On which of the following lies the burden of proving an offence? |
| A. | on the prosecution |
| B. | on the accused |
| C. | at both |
| D. | at the discretion of the court |
| Answer» B. on the accused | |
| 41. |
n criminal cases, especially while appraising the evidence of eyewitnesses, the axiom falsus in uno, falsus in amani simply cannot be applied.It is stated that- |
| A. | In State of Punjab Vs Ajaib Singh |
| B. | Venkataswamy Vs Prosecution Officer, Andhra Pradesh High Court |
| C. | In State of Punjab Vs. SS |
| D. | In Harishchand Vs. State of Delhi |
| Answer» B. Venkataswamy Vs Prosecution Officer, Andhra Pradesh High Court | |
| 42. |
In which chapter of the Indian Evidence Act are the provisions relating to the burden of proof recorded? |
| A. | चैप्टर 4 |
| B. | चैप्टर 5 |
| C. | चैप्टर 6 |
| D. | चैप्टर 7 |
| Answer» C. चैप्टर 6 | |
| 43. |
the fact to be proved is called |
| A. | factum probena |
| B. | factum probandum |
| C. | lax fori |
| D. | laxi losie |
| Answer» C. lax fori | |
| 44. |
'B' makes a written agreement to sell a horse to 'A' for Rs.1,000 or Rs.1,500. To show what price was to be paid- |
| A. | Oral evidence can be given |
| B. | Must see the past character of the parties |
| C. | Oral evidence cannot be given. |
| D. | None of the above. |
| Answer» D. None of the above. | |
| 45. |
A sells a horse to B and gives an oral warranty that it is good. 'A' gives to 'B' by writing these words that he bought a horse from 'A' for Rs.500/-. Will A be able to prove the oral warranty? |
| A. | Yes |
| B. | No |
| C. | धारा 92 भा.सा. अधि. के तहत प्रतिषेधित है |
| D. | धारा 91 भा. सा. अधि. के तहत दस्तावेजी साक्ष्य साबित किया जा सकता है |
| Answer» B. No | |
| 46. |
'A' sells 'B' in Jaipur by deed 'Meri Sampada' of 100 Baghs. 'A' has a property of 100 bighas in Jaipur. According to which section of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, evidence cannot be given of the fact that the property acquired for sale was situated at a different place and of different size? |
| A. | धारा 94 |
| B. | धारा 95 |
| C. | धारा 96 |
| D. | धारा 97 |
| Answer» B. धारा 95 | |
| 47. |
'A' agrees in writing to sell his horse to 'B' for Rs.1,000/- or Rs.1,500/- |
| A. | Evidence cannot be given to show whether price was to be paid |
| B. | अ को यह सिद्ध करना होगा कि रू. 1,500/- अदा किये जाने थे |
| C. | B must prove which of the two values was to be paid |
| D. | ब को सिद्ध करना होगा कि रू. 1,000/- अदा किया जाना है |
| Answer» B. अ को यह सिद्ध करना होगा कि रू. 1,500/- अदा किये जाने थे | |
| 48. |
To clarify the ambiguity in which of the following cases oral evidence can be given- |
| A. | The seller sold his house to the buyer by way of sale deed stating that his house is situated in Howrah while he does not have any house in Howrah. His house is in Calcutta, which he is in possession on the date of execution of the sale deed |
| B. | विक्रेता ने लिखत द्धारा क्रेता को अपना एक घोड़ा इस उल्लेख के साथ विक्रय किया कि घोड़ा रूय 1,000/- में अथवा रू. 1,200/- में विक्रय किाय जाता है |
| C. | Some blanks are left in an instrument Seller wants to clear the vacancies |
| D. | विक्रेता ने क्रेता को लिखत द्धारा अपनी रामपुर स्थित सौ बीघा जमीन बेची और रामपुर में उसके पास 100 बीघा जमीन है विक्रेता साक्ष्य देना चाहता है कि उसने भिन्न स्थान की जमीन बेची है |
| Answer» B. विक्रेता ने लिखत द्धारा क्रेता को अपना एक घोड़ा इस उल्लेख के साथ विक्रय किया कि घोड़ा रूय 1,000/- में अथवा रू. 1,200/- में विक्रय किाय जाता है | |
| 49. |
'A' above 'B' in writing makes a sale of Rs. In 1,000, 'A' of my white horse has one white and one brown horse. In that case- |
| A. | No evidence need be given to show that A never intended to sell his brown horse |
| B. | Such evidence can be given. that B's brown horse was to be sold |
| C. | Court to presume that only horse was to be sold |
| D. | The court may, if it so desires, presume that the white horse was not to be sold. |
| Answer» B. Such evidence can be given. that B's brown horse was to be sold | |
| 50. |
'A' hires 'B''s accommodation and gives a card which reads Rs.200/- per month in rooms. An oral agreement that these essays included food in part. Gives oral evidence to 'A' to prove it. Such evidence- |
| A. | भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 91 के अंतर्गत अग्राह्म है |
| B. | भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 92 के अंतर्गत अग्राह्म है |
| C. | planet is |
| D. | is inconsistent |
| Answer» D. is inconsistent | |