In the possession of 'Firoz Bhai Cama's a plot of land was in Santa Cruz, 'Khudavad Vajandi' claim that he himself is entitled to that land which 'Firoz Bhai' Cama denies. 'Khuddad Vajandi' presents evidence in its support. But that evidence is not enough. Firoz Bhai is unable to produce any evidence. Which statement is correct in these circumstances-

• A. Khudadad Vajandi is entitled to get the decree, because he has produced some evidence
• B. Khudadad Vajandi is entitled to get the decree, as Firoz Cama has not produced any evidence
• C. Khudadad Vajandi is not entitled to receive the decree, as he has not borne the burden of proving the ownership
• D. Both Khudadad Vajandi and Firoz Bhai Cama are not entitled to that land, as neither of them has substantiated their claim.