MCQOPTIONS
Saved Bookmarks
MCQOPTIONS
This section includes 657 Mcqs, each offering curated multiple-choice questions to sharpen your Testing Subject knowledge and support exam preparation. Choose a topic below to get started.
| 1. |
The illustration thatA and B are being jointly tried for the murder of C. It is proved that A said, B and I have killed Sis related to: |
| A. | भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 30 से। |
| B. | भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 24 से। |
| C. | भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 25 से। |
| D. | भारतीयसाक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 27 सं। |
| Answer» B. भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 24 से। | |
| 2. |
The verifiable value of a retracted confession is that- |
| A. | still remains an evidence |
| B. | Evidence is true but a weak evidence |
| C. | becomes evidence of a confirmation |
| D. | Changes from 'only evidence' to 'other evidence' |
| Answer» D. Changes from 'only evidence' to 'other evidence' | |
| 3. |
Assertion (A) Sanction is required to be maintained in some cases Reason (R) Extra-judicial sanction must be maintained in all cases. |
| A. | (A) and (R) both are correct and (R) is the correct explanation of (A) |
| B. | (A) and (R) both are correct but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A) |
| C. | (A) is correct but (R) is wrong |
| D. | (A) is wrong, but (R) is correct |
| Answer» C. (A) is correct but (R) is wrong | |
| 4. |
A confession of an accused under section 30 of the Evidence Act is used against a co-accused— |
| A. | as evidence |
| B. | as corroborative evidence only |
| C. | as substantive evidence |
| D. | none of the above |
| Answer» C. as substantive evidence | |
| 5. |
'A' and 'B' are tried jointly for the murder of 'C'. It is proved that 'A' said 'B' and I have killed 'C', according to which section of the Indian Evidence Act, this confession against 'B' shall be considered by the court on the effect of this confession against 'B' can do |
| A. | धारा 28 |
| B. | धारा 29 |
| C. | धारा 30 |
| D. | धरा 31 |
| Answer» D. धरा 31 | |
| 6. |
Assertion (A) Extrajudicial confession, if voluntary, can be credible with other evidence. Reason (R) Extrajudicial confession is a weak source of evidence. |
| A. | (A) and (R) both are correct and (R) is the correct explanation of (A) |
| B. | (A) and (R) both are correct but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A) |
| C. | (A) is correct but (R) is wrong |
| D. | (A) is wrong but (R) is correct |
| Answer» B. (A) and (R) both are correct but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A) | |
| 7. |
The statement made by the co-accused at the time of committing the offense is- |
| A. | धारा 6 के अंतर्गत ग्राहा |
| B. | धारा 8 के अंतर्गत ग्राहा |
| C. | धारा 30 के अंतर्गत ग्राहय |
| D. | Absolutely unacceptable |
| Answer» D. Absolutely unacceptable | |
| 8. |
In a suit, A and B were tried jointly against C. A said that B and I have killed C. What kind of literary significance would A's statement have against B's? |
| A. | conclusive |
| B. | The court can consider the statement against B. |
| C. | Court will not consider A's statement against B. |
| D. | A's statement is a confession only against A. |
| Answer» C. Court will not consider A's statement against B. | |
| 9. |
The confession of the co-accused is relevant to— |
| A. | धारा 30 में |
| B. | धारा 24 में |
| C. | धारा 133 में |
| D. | none of the above |
| Answer» B. धारा 24 में | |
| 10. |
'A' and 'B' are tried jointly for the murder of 'C'. It is proved that 'A' said 'B' and I killed 'C'. Of what nature is this confession against 'B' evidence? |
| A. | Essential evidence |
| B. | only conclusive evidence |
| C. | follow-up evidence |
| D. | none of these |
| Answer» C. follow-up evidence | |
| 11. |
'A' and 'B' were tried jointly in the offense of murder of 'C'. It is proved that A has admitted that I and B have killed C. This confession of 'A'— |
| A. | completely inconsistent |
| B. | The court may take this confession into consideration against B. |
| C. | This confession can be taken into consideration only against A. |
| D. | Evidence against B is admissible only if it is made in the presence of a Magistrate |
| Answer» C. This confession can be taken into consideration only against A. | |
| 12. |
Even when a confession is relevant, under what circumstances would it become inconsistent? |
| A. | when it was done under a promise to keep it secret |
| B. | when the person making the confession was under the influence of alcohol |
| C. | When it was done in response to questions which the accused was not required to answer |
| D. | none of the above |
| Answer» E. | |
| 13. |
Extra-judicial sanction means a sanction which- |
| A. | made before a magistrate in court |
| B. | from a police officer |
| C. | done by Dr. |
| D. | none of the above |
| Answer» D. none of the above | |
| 14. |
In which of the following Acts the provision forextra-judicial sanctionhas been made? |
| A. | दण्ड प्रक्रिया संहिता 1973 की धारा 163 में |
| B. | भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम 1872 की धारा 29 में |
| C. | दण्ड प्रकिया संहिता 1973 की धारा 281 में |
| D. | भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम 1872 की धारा 30 में |
| Answer» C. दण्ड प्रकिया संहिता 1973 की धारा 281 में | |
| 15. |
hen the confession of the accused has not been recorded in the manner contained in section 164 of the Criminal Procedure, the oral evidence of the Magistrate to prove that the confession has been so made is not a mistake.It has been determined: |
| A. | In State of Uttar Pradesh Vs Singhara Singh |
| B. | In State of Rajasthan Vs Rahman |
| C. | In Amini vs State of Kerala |
| D. | Dhananjay Reddy in Karnataka State |
| Answer» B. In State of Rajasthan Vs Rahman | |
| 16. |
Choose the wrong statement- Confession becomes illogical |
| A. | When the accused vote in making such confession was |
| B. | When such a confession which is made by inducement on the part of the person in authority |
| C. | when it is not made in the presence of a magistrate |
| D. | all of the above is correct |
| Answer» B. When such a confession which is made by inducement on the part of the person in authority | |
| 17. |
Talking to yourself can also lead to acceptance. The sanction need not be communicated to any other person, had the Act been made, in the following case— |
| A. | Sankriya Vanam Rajasthan State |
| B. | Buta Singh Uttar Pradesh State |
| C. | Sahu vs State of Uttar Pradesh |
| D. | Nishikant Jha Vs State of Bihar |
| Answer» D. Nishikant Jha Vs State of Bihar | |
| 18. |
Consequence of deceit committed under promise to keep secret or to obtain it without being informed that the confession will be used as evidence is relevant— |
| A. | धारा 24 में |
| B. | धारा 25 में |
| C. | धारा 27, 28 में |
| D. | धारा 29 में |
| Answer» E. | |
| 19. |
Acceptance is granted when- |
| A. | promised to keep secret |
| B. | the accused vote |
| C. | If the accused was not informed of his right to the confession |
| D. | all three of the above |
| Answer» E. | |
| 20. |
Confession made after allurement, threat, or effect on the mind created by promise has been removed- |
| A. | धारा 28 में सुसंगत है |
| B. | धारा 24 में सुसंगत है |
| C. | धारा 29 में सुसंगत है |
| D. | धारा 30 में सुसंगत है |
| Answer» B. धारा 24 में सुसंगत है | |
| 21. |
Assertion (A) If a confession is free and voluntary, it is always used against the person making it. Reason (B) Confession is not admissible against a co-accused. Select the correct answer with the help of the code given below : |
| A. | (A) and (R) both are correct and (R) is the correct explanation of (A) |
| B. | (A) and (R) both are correct but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A) |
| C. | (A) is correct but (R) is wrong |
| D. | (A) is wrong, but (R) is correct |
| Answer» E. | |
| 22. |
Which of the following cases was decided on the basis of evidence only of the tears in the woman's eyes? |
| A. | राजस्थान राज्य बनाम श्रीमती कनूरी देवी, 1998 राज का |
| B. | शमीम रहमानी बनाम उ.प्र. राज्य, 1975 सु. को. का |
| C. | के, एम नानावती बनाम महाराष्ट्र राज्य 1961 सु. को का |
| D. | पलविन्दर कौर बनाम पंजाब राज्य, 1952 सु.को. का |
| Answer» E. | |
| 23. |
The delay in the examination of the witness by the Investigating Officer does not in itself make the prosecution account suspicious. The Investigating Officer should be questioned about the delayed trial. It was held in which of the following cases? |
| A. | State of Uttar Pradesh Vs Satish |
| B. | Megha Singh vs State of Haryana |
| C. | n, ct. State of Delhi Vs Ravikant Sharma |
| D. | Balakrishna vs State of Orissa |
| Answer» B. Megha Singh vs State of Haryana | |
| 24. |
Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer using the codes given below the Lists-List-I---------------------- -------List-IIA.Addiction, Threat and Confession by Promise----- Adhunu Nagesia Vs StateB.Confession before Customs Officer------State of Punjab Vs BarkatramC.First Information Report of the accused Sanctioned in----Pyarelal Bhargava Vs. State of Rajasthan D.Finding of Facts Pursuant to Statement in Police Custody---- State of Bombay Vs. Kathi Kalu ----------------- -------------------------------------------------- ---------Odd |
| A. | A--B--C--Dn1--4--3--2 |
| B. | A--B--C--Dn2--3--4--1 |
| C. | A--B--C--Dn2--1--3--4 |
| D. | A--B--C--Dn3--2--1--4 |
| Answer» E. | |
| 25. |
Assertion (A ) : Acceptance can be exercised against a co-respondent. Reason (R ) : It is binding on the grantor. It can also be used in favor of the acceptor. Select the correct answer from the codes given below : |
| A. | (A) and (R) both are correct and (R) is the correct explanation of (A) |
| B. | (A) and (R) both are correct but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A) |
| C. | (A) is correct but (R) is wrong |
| D. | (A) is wrong, but (R) is correct |
| Answer» E. | |
| 26. |
Palwinder Kaur vs State of Punjab is related to which of the following? |
| A. | Acceptance |
| B. | Death statement |
| C. | entries in the books of accounts |
| D. | consistency of decisions |
| Answer» B. Death statement | |
| 27. |
Palvinder Kaur vs State of Punjab is related to which of the following? |
| A. | indicative case |
| B. | Secondary evidence |
| C. | Acceptance |
| D. | Acceptance |
| Answer» D. Acceptance | |
| 28. |
In the course of investigation, a police officer was told that the design was executed according to the plan, but who were the persons involved in the murder or the narrator did not make any reference of his own. |
| A. | भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 25 से वर्जित होने के कारण, अभियोजक को यह कथन साबित करने की अनुमति नहीं होगी |
| B. | भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 25 से वर्जित न होने के कारण, अभियोजक यह कथन साबित कर सकता है |
| C. | Only that part of the statement can be proved under which a fact is discovered as a result of the information received. |
| D. | none of the above is correct |
| Answer» D. none of the above is correct | |
| 29. |
What is the nature of the statement given under Narco Test? |
| A. | this is not a proof |
| B. | this is scientific evidence |
| C. | it is an oral evidence |
| D. | it is circumstantial evidence |
| Answer» E. | |
| 30. |
What is not an essential element to attract the provision of section 27 of the Evidence Act? |
| A. | person must be accused of an offense |
| B. | be male or female |
| C. | should be informed by |
| D. | Information must result in recovery of fact |
| Answer» C. should be informed by | |
| 31. |
Which of the following cases is not related to Sanction? |
| A. | Kotaiya Vs King Emperor |
| B. | State of Uttar Pradesh Vs Devman Usadhyay |
| C. | State of Bombay Vs Kathi Kalu |
| D. | MC vs ponen |
| Answer» E. | |
| 32. |
In which of the following cases it has been held that section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is an exception to sections 24, 25 and 26? |
| A. | Pakla Narayan Swami vs. King Emperor |
| B. | Inayatullah vs State of Maharashtra |
| C. | State of Uttar Pradesh Vs Devman Upadhyay |
| D. | P. Kotaiya Vs. King Emperor |
| Answer» C. State of Uttar Pradesh Vs Devman Upadhyay | |
| 33. |
In which of the following cases the constitutional validity of Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act was challenged on the ground of violation of Article 20(3) of the Indian Constitution? |
| A. | U.P. State Vs Devman Upadhyay |
| B. | State of Bombay Vs Kathikalu |
| C. | Inayatullah vs State of Maharashtra |
| D. | Nandini Satpathy Vs P.L. paddy |
| Answer» C. Inayatullah vs State of Maharashtra | |
| 34. |
The utility of Section 27 of the Evidence Act is to obtain, in special circumstances, the information of the article relating to the offense concealed by the accused in police custody and, according to his direction, to obtain the same, from which weapons, clothes, ornaments related to the offense of the deceased or his dead body, etc. The principle of justice was propounded to the said intention: |
| A. | Pulukuri Kotaiya vs Emperor |
| B. | Kushal Rao vs State of Bombay |
| C. | Savaldas vs State of Bihar |
| D. | Pakla Narayan Swami vs. Emperor |
| Answer» B. Kushal Rao vs State of Bombay | |
| 35. |
In which of the following cases the constitutionality of Article 27 was challenged on the ground of infringement of Article 20(3) of the Constitution? |
| A. | State of Bombay vs Kathi Kalu |
| B. | Mirza, Akbar Vs King Empress |
| C. | State of UP-Vs Devman Upadhyay |
| D. | Queen Empress vs Abdullah |
| Answer» B. Mirza, Akbar Vs King Empress | |
| 36. |
Under which section of the Evidence Act the information obtained from brain mapping and narco analysis with the voluntarily consent of the accused is relevant? |
| A. | धारा 7 |
| B. | धारा 17 |
| C. | धारा 27 |
| D. | धारा 30 |
| Answer» D. धारा 30 | |
| 37. |
UP State vs Devman Upadhyay case is related to- |
| A. | By conspiracy |
| B. | with approval |
| C. | by escrow |
| D. | hypothetically |
| Answer» C. by escrow | |
| 38. |
An accused in police custody informs the SHO that the key by which he has stolen the safe by opening the safe has been kept in the courtyard of his house. To what extent can this information be proved? |
| A. | to commit the offense of theft |
| B. | vault unlocker |
| C. | Theft and destruction of evidence by unlocking the safe |
| D. | to keep the key in the courtyard of the house |
| Answer» E. | |
| 39. |
In which case Section 27 was upheld constitutionally? |
| A. | Devman Upadhyay Vs U.P. state |
| B. | Ahir Raja Khena Vs Saurashtra State |
| C. | Subramania Gonda Vs Madras State |
| D. | Nathu Vs U.P. state |
| Answer» B. Ahir Raja Khena Vs Saurashtra State | |
| 40. |
A voluntary confession is acceptable in evidence— |
| A. | when the police officer |
| B. | magistrate |
| C. | With a prayer to the village sarpanch that he will be saved from the police |
| D. | When does not disclose any fact and is made to a police officer |
| Answer» E. | |
| 41. |
A confession made before a police officer shall not be proved against any person accused of an offense The reason for this rule is stated to be— |
| A. | In Queen Impress vs Abdullah |
| B. | In Queen Impes Vs Babulal |
| C. | Queen vs Lillyman |
| D. | In Pakala Narayana Swamy Vs Samrat |
| Answer» C. Queen vs Lillyman | |
| 42. |
A confession made before a police officer shall be admissible only if he- |
| A. | Can be proved against the accused, when it is made in the immediate presence of an Executive Magistrate |
| B. | when it is against the co-accused |
| C. | can be proved against the accused to the extent that any facts come from him |
| D. | none of the above |
| Answer» D. none of the above | |
| 43. |
'Kamal' who is accused of murder and who was in police custody, then he gave this statement that- (a) I have killed Nupur Ghosh with an ax (b) I threw that ax inside the well. As a result the ax was recovered from the well. Which of the above statements in the court can be made against 'Lotus'- |
| A. | Statement 'A' |
| B. | Statement 'B' |
| C. | Statements 'A' and 'B' |
| D. | none of these |
| Answer» C. Statements 'A' and 'B' | |
| 44. |
'A' an unmarried woman accused of causing the murder of her unborn child was taken to a doctor for examination in police custody, then she confessed to the crime, the police constable stood outside the room where 'A' was The trial was going on, this confession- |
| A. | is insistent |
| B. | graham is |
| C. | Court has discretion |
| D. | neither of the above |
| Answer» B. graham is | |
| 45. |
The confession is granted by the accused- |
| A. | from a police officer |
| B. | While in the custody of a police officer, a doctor has |
| C. | While living in the desire of a police officer, he has asked his friend |
| D. | Ask a Spiritual Counselor to Inspire Your Spirit's Well-being |
| Answer» E. | |
| 46. |
A sanction is an advance which the accused has- |
| A. | While in the custody of the police officer, the magistrate has |
| B. | While not in the custody of the police officer, he has done this with a friend. |
| C. | While in the custody of a police officer, a doctor has |
| D. | Ask a Spiritual Counselor to Inspire Your Spirit's Well-being |
| Answer» D. Ask a Spiritual Counselor to Inspire Your Spirit's Well-being | |
| 47. |
While in the custody of the police who is accused of committing theft in place of 'B'. Makes the following statement before the police. Last Monday I had stolen at B's place The property consisting of a pair of gold bangles and a gold chain was hidden by me in the back of the courtyard. If I am taken to that place, I will dig them out and take them out. The jewelery was recovered from this statement. Under section 27 of the Evidence Act, what part of the said statement is Graham- |
| A. | The whole statement |
| B. | All statements except the first line |
| C. | The property consisting of a pair of gold bangles and a gold chain is hidden in my courtyard. |
| D. | none of the above |
| Answer» D. none of the above | |
| 48. |
'A' makes a confession before an accused, a forest officer in whom the powers of a police officer are vested except the power to produce challans. During the trial, a question is raised regarding the admissibility of that sanction. Then which of the following arguments given is correct? |
| A. | The confession so made is admissible in evidence |
| B. | that confession is admissible in evidence |
| C. | It is not acceptable as it comes under the category of confession made before a police officer. |
| D. | It was admissible only because the concerned officer of Jungle was not the complainant in that case. |
| Answer» B. that confession is admissible in evidence | |
| 49. |
The term judicial sanction means |
| A. | It is given to the police |
| B. | Caused by any inducement, threat or promise |
| C. | It is given before any court officer |
| D. | It is given before a magistrate |
| Answer» E. | |
| 50. |
Under which section of the Indian Evidence Act is the confession made before a magistrate relevant? |
| A. | धारा 24 |
| B. | धारा 25 |
| C. | धारा 26 |
| D. | धारा 27 |
| Answer» D. धारा 27 | |