hen the confession of the accused has not been recorded in the manner contained in section 164 of the Criminal Procedure, the oral evidence of the Magistrate to prove that the confession has been so made is not a mistake.It has been determined:

Question

TuteeHUB · Accepted Answer

In State of Rajasthan Vs Rahman

TuteeHUB · Answer

In State of Uttar Pradesh Vs Singhara Singh

TuteeHUB · Answer

In Amini vs State of Kerala

TuteeHUB · Answer

Dhananjay Reddy in Karnataka State

1.	hen the confession of the accused has not been recorded in the manner contained in section 164 of the Criminal Procedure, the oral evidence of the Magistrate to prove that the confession has been so made is not a mistake.It has been determined:
A.	In State of Uttar Pradesh Vs Singhara Singh
B.	In State of Rajasthan Vs Rahman
C.	In Amini vs State of Kerala
D.	Dhananjay Reddy in Karnataka State
Answer» B. In State of Rajasthan Vs Rahman

hen the confession of the accused has not been recorded in the manner contained in section 164 of the Criminal Procedure, the oral evidence of the Magistrate to prove that the confession has been so made is not a mistake.It has been determined:

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related MCQs

Reply to Comment