Point out incorrect response. The following are the ingredients of the defence of unsoundness of mind under section 84 I.P.C. :

Incapacity must be by reason of unsoundness of mind of the offender and incapacity must exist at the time of doing of the act constituting the offence.

Act must be done by a person of unsound mind.

Such person must be incapable of knowing : (i) the nature of the act, or (ii) that the act was contrary to law, or (iii) that the act was wrong.

A person must be suffering from some defect of reason whether it is because of some disease of mind or otherwise at the time of commission of the crime.

Point out incorrect response. The following are the ingredients of the

1.	Point out incorrect response. The following are the ingredients of the defence of unsoundness of mind under section 84 I.P.C. :
A.	Act must be done by a person of unsound mind.
B.	Such person must be incapable of knowing : (i) the nature of the act, or (ii) that the act was contrary to law, or (iii) that the act was wrong.
C.	A person must be suffering from some defect of reason whether it is because of some disease of mind or otherwise at the time of commission of the crime.
D.	Incapacity must be by reason of unsoundness of mind of the offender and incapacity must exist at the time of doing of the act constituting the offence.
Answer» D. Incapacity must be by reason of unsoundness of mind of the offender and incapacity must exist at the time of doing of the act constituting the offence.

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related MCQs

Law directed by the Supreme Court shall be binding on all the Courts with the territory of India. Here Courts means:
Threatening to commit certain acts forbidden by Indian Penal Code is associated with which one of the following?
A has grown a tree on his land. The branches of the tree are overhanging on the land of B. under the law, B is entitled to:
Point out incorrect response. The following persons are exempted from the jurisdiction of criminal courts in India.
X while in the state of voluntary intoxication kills Z. prosecution fails to establish that X could form an intention of a sober man. X is guilty of:
The extent to which the right of private defence of body causing death can be exercising is laid down in
The accused ravished a girl of 13 years in furtherance of the act of rape placed his hand upon her mouth thereby causing death by suffocation. The sole defence was a plea of drunkenness.
In the above stated question the person is guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder because in this case
A drunken person killed his uncle. It was established that he was in such a state of intoxication, incapable of forming specific intent to kill. He is:
Point out incorrect response. The following are the ingredients of the defence of unsoundness of mind under section 84 I.P.C. :

Point out incorrect response. The following are the ingredients of the defence of unsoundness of mind under section 84 I.P.C. :

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related MCQs

Reply to Comment