MCQOPTIONS
Saved Bookmarks
MCQOPTIONS
This section includes 657 Mcqs, each offering curated multiple-choice questions to sharpen your Testing Subject knowledge and support exam preparation. Choose a topic below to get started.
| 1. |
The word injury denotes any kind of harm which is illegally caused to any person |
| A. | the body |
| B. | reputation |
| C. | Property |
| D. | all of which |
| Answer» E. | |
| 2. |
The term 'harmony' is defined in the Indian Penal Code- |
| A. | धारा 44 में |
| B. | धारा 51 में |
| C. | धारा 52 में |
| D. | धारा 52-क में |
| Answer» D. धारा 52-क में | |
| 3. |
'A' intentionally causes the death of 'B' partly by beating him and partly by abstaining from giving him food illegally, 'A' has committed the offense of— |
| A. | culpable homicide not |
| B. | the killing |
| C. | grievous hurt |
| D. | Uphati |
| Answer» C. grievous hurt | |
| 4. |
Which one of the following sections of the Indian Penal Code 1860 is not related to joint and compulsory liability? |
| A. | धारा 34,35 व 37 |
| B. | धारा 36 |
| C. | धारा 141,149,396,460 |
| D. | धारा 111,117,120,ख |
| Answer» C. धारा 141,149,396,460 | |
| 5. |
A consequence may be said to have been caused voluntarily if any person— |
| A. | intends to cause |
| B. | has the knowledge that he can cause it |
| C. | had reason to believe that it was likely to be |
| D. | in all the above situations |
| Answer» E. | |
| 6. |
Consider the following statements: 1. IPC. Section 34 requires two persons while I.P.C. Section 149 requires five persons. 2. IPC Section 34 of the Act requires a general intention whereas I.D. NS. Section 149 of both requires prior consent. 3. IPC. Both Sections 34 and 149 require prior consent. NS. Section 34 of the IPC and I.D. NS. Section 149 of the IPC both create the specified offence. Which of the above statements are correct? |
| A. | 1 और 3 |
| B. | 2 और 3 |
| C. | 1 और 2 |
| D. | 2 और 4 |
| Answer» D. 2 और 4 | |
| 7. |
Under which section of the Indian Penal Code, the word offense is defined? |
| A. | धारा 39 |
| B. | धारा 40 |
| C. | धारा 41 |
| D. | धारा 42 |
| Answer» C. धारा 41 | |
| 8. |
The definition of crime is given as: |
| A. | भारतीय दण्ड संहिता, 1860 के अध्याय-2 में |
| B. | दण्ड प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973 की धारा 2(एन) में |
| C. | भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम, 1872 की धारा 3 में |
| D. | all of the above |
| Answer» C. भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम, 1872 की धारा 3 में | |
| 9. |
'A' intentionally causes the death of 'Z', partly by illegal omission to provide food to 'Z', and partly by beating 'Z'. 'A' commits the offense of murder on the basis of which of the following sections of the Indian Penal Code? |
| A. | धारा 36 |
| B. | धारा 37 |
| C. | धारा 34 |
| D. | धारा 35 |
| Answer» B. धारा 37 | |
| 10. |
By the Supreme Court The authentic explanation of the difference between sections 34 and 149 of Cr.No. has been given in the following- |
| A. | State of Maharashtra Vs M.H. George |
| B. | Gurudev Singh Vs State of Punjab |
| C. | Ram Kumar vs State of Haryana |
| D. | Nanak Chand Vs State of Punjab |
| Answer» E. | |
| 11. |
Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer from the code given below the Lists-List-I-----------------List-IIA.Rax Vs. Levit----------- MurderB.Tabu Chetia Vs State of Assam-------Criminal ConspiracyC.Vijayan Vs State of Kerala---------Mutilation of MindD.U.P. State Vs Virendra Prasad--------The Origin of the Facts |
| A. | A--B--C--Dn2--1--4--3 |
| B. | A--B--C--Dn1--2--4--3 |
| C. | A--B--C--Dn2--1--3--4 |
| D. | A--B--C--Dn1--2--3--4 |
| Answer» D. A--B--C--Dn1--2--3--4 | |
| 12. |
Which of the following is not related to the principle of joint liability based on common intention? |
| A. | Barindra Kumar Ghosh vs Emperor |
| B. | Mehboob Shah Vs Emperor |
| C. | Jo.M. Desai vs State of Bombay |
| D. | rex vs govinda |
| Answer» E. | |
| 13. |
Which of the following cases is related to general intent? 1. Mehboob Shah Vs Emperor 2. Barindra Kumar Ghosh Vs Emperor 3. DPP. Vs. Beard 4. Mr. Kantia Vs. State of Bombay Select the correct answer using the code given below- |
| A. | 1.2 और 3 |
| B. | 1.2 और 4 |
| C. | 2.3 और 4 |
| D. | 1.3 और 4 |
| Answer» C. 2.3 और 4 | |
| 14. |
Which of the following is not related to the principle of common intention? |
| A. | Rishi Dev Pandey Vs State of U.P. |
| B. | R. vs tolson |
| C. | Mehboob Shah Vs Emperor |
| D. | Barindra Kumar Ghosh vs Emperor |
| Answer» C. Mehboob Shah Vs Emperor | |
| 15. |
The Supreme Court has to explain the difference between Section 34 and Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code- |
| A. | Shukla Vs. State of Rajasthan |
| B. | In Nanak Chandra Vs State of Punjab |
| C. | How. Matthews et al. vs. State of Travancore |
| D. | In Pramathnath Talukdar Vs Saroj Ranjan Sarkar |
| Answer» C. How. Matthews et al. vs. State of Travancore | |
| 16. |
In certain circumstances, general intent may also arise at the scene which is determined by the facts and circumstances of the case and the conduct of the accused. |
| A. | Rishi Dev Pandey Vs State of Uttar Pradesh |
| B. | Major Singh Vs State of Punjab |
| C. | Mehboob Shah Vs Samrat |
| D. | J.M. Desai v. State of Bombay |
| Answer» B. Major Singh Vs State of Punjab | |
| 17. |
Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer using the code given below the lists: List-I Vs B. General Intent -------------- 2. R. Vs McNaughton C. Requirement -------------- - 3. State Vs KM . Nanavati D. Murder on Grave and Sudden Provocation-----4.R.Vs Dudley Stephen |
| A. | A--B--C--Dn2--1--4--3 |
| B. | A--B--C--Dn1--2--4--3 |
| C. | A--B--C--Dn2--1--3--4 |
| D. | A--B--C--Dn1--2--3--4 |
| Answer» B. A--B--C--Dn1--2--4--3 | |
| 18. |
Which of the following is not an essential element of Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code? |
| A. | the commission of a criminal act by several persons |
| B. | criminal act done in furtherance of common intention |
| C. | having a predetermined plan between persons committing criminal acts |
| D. | act done in furtherance of common purpose |
| Answer» E. | |
| 19. |
With reference to joint liability under section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, point out the incorrect answer from the following: |
| A. | Common sense means prior meeting of ideas |
| B. | Common intention means knowledge of and participation in it |
| C. | Common intention means that every criminal not only knows the intention but has also agreed to it. |
| D. | Common intention means only discussion between each of the criminals whether they agree with him or not |
| Answer» E. | |
| 20. |
Which of the following is not an essential element in the implementation of Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860? |
| A. | general intent |
| B. | to commit crime |
| C. | अभियोक्तों की संख्या 5 हो |
| D. | Crime is the forerunner of general intent |
| Answer» D. Crime is the forerunner of general intent | |
| 21. |
Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code defines the term common intention. According to this which one of the following elements is not its essential element? |
| A. | criminal act must have been committed by someone |
| B. | The alleged act must be by several persons |
| C. | Everyone should have the same intention to plan the work and implement it. |
| D. | Everyone should get equal benefits. |
| Answer» C. Everyone should have the same intention to plan the work and implement it. | |
| 22. |
Which of the following cases is not related to Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code? |
| A. | Mehboob Shah Vs Emperor |
| B. | Barindra Kumar Ghosh vs Emperor |
| C. | KM Nanavati vs State of Bombay |
| D. | J.M. Desai v. State of Bombay |
| Answer» D. J.M. Desai v. State of Bombay | |
| 23. |
Which of the following is not a condition of criminal liability? |
| A. | Wisdom to differentiate between good and bad |
| B. | Knowledge that the act done is prohibited by law |
| C. | Free will |
| D. | knowledge of the facts on which the good or bad of an action depends |
| Answer» B. Knowledge that the act done is prohibited by law | |
| 24. |
'A' is found guilty of attempt to murder in furtherance of common intention— |
| A. | 'A' voluntarily obtained the weapon of crime |
| B. | The weapon of crime was taken away from A's house without A's knowledge |
| C. | A was forced to buy arms by threatening to drop the goods |
| D. | When the weapon was snatched from A and he did not report to the police |
| Answer» B. The weapon of crime was taken away from A's house without A's knowledge | |
| 25. |
State the correct answer: Joint liability based on common intention requires- |
| A. | criminal act committed by more than one person |
| B. | common intention among the accused |
| C. | Active presence of the accused in the criminal act |
| D. | all of the above |
| Answer» E. | |
| 26. |
In the commission of any criminal act, I.P.No. The principle of joint liability in section 34 of the Act requires that |
| A. | The accused has only been involved in planning the preparation of the act. |
| B. | The common intention to attest to the criminals is there. |
| C. | Any member of an unlawful assembly has committed any offense in furtherance of the general purpose of the assembly. |
| D. | None of the above. |
| Answer» C. Any member of an unlawful assembly has committed any offense in furtherance of the general purpose of the assembly. | |
| 27. |
What offenses come under section 34 of the Indian Penal Code as an exception to the rule that all accused are required to be physically present at the scene? |
| A. | crime against the human body |
| B. | Crimes against property |
| C. | crime against religion |
| D. | crime against marriage |
| Answer» C. crime against religion | |
| 28. |
In which one of the following cases, the Supreme Court of India has ruled thatthe act of enforcing section 34 of the Indian Penal Code is done in furtherance of their common intention by all the persons involved but in all the circumstances the part by physical presence of all It is not mandatory to take |
| A. | Kantia Ramaiah v. State of Bombay |
| B. | Jo.M. Desai vs State of Bombay |
| C. | Mehboob Shah Vs Samrat |
| D. | in all of the above |
| Answer» C. Mehboob Shah Vs Samrat | |
| 29. |
The principle of joint liability in the commission of a criminal act requires that- |
| A. | The accused has been involved in planning the preparation of quantity work. |
| B. | The common intention to induce criminals would exist |
| C. | There is a long gap of time between a member of an unlawful assembly committing any criminal act in furtherance of the common object of the assembly |
| D. | There should be a long gap of time between the creation of the common intention and the commission of the criminal act. |
| Answer» C. There is a long gap of time between a member of an unlawful assembly committing any criminal act in furtherance of the common object of the assembly | |
| 30. |
In which case was the statementhelpers also those who only stand who only stand and waitin which case? |
| A. | Mehboob Shah Vs Emperor |
| B. | Barindra Kumar Ghosh vs Emperor |
| C. | R. vs prince |
| D. | Sheraj vs. D. Routzen |
| Answer» C. R. vs prince | |
| 31. |
The judgment in the case of postmaster murder before the Privy Council was given by- |
| A. | By Lord Sumner |
| B. | By Sir Madhavan Nair |
| C. | By Lord Calories |
| D. | By Lord Halden |
| Answer» B. By Sir Madhavan Nair | |
| 32. |
'A' and 'B' plan to rob a bank. A went to the bank and killed the cashier with his pistol and took the money. While 'A' was returning from the bank, he was also killed by the guard of the bank, 'B' who was waiting outside the bank on his motor cycle fled. What is the criminal liability of 'B'? |
| A. | no liability |
| B. | Liable only for criminal conspiracy |
| C. | liable only for robbery |
| D. | Liable for both murder and robbery of cashiers |
| Answer» E. | |
| 33. |
In which of the following cases was the statementhelp are also those who merely stand and waitin crimes? |
| A. | Mehboob Shah Vs Emperor |
| B. | Barindra Kumar Ghosh vs Emperor |
| C. | R. vs prince |
| D. | Sheraj vs. D. Routzen |
| Answer» C. R. vs prince | |
| 34. |
Which one of the following cases is related to Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code? |
| A. | Of. M. Nanavati Vs State of Maharashtra |
| B. | Niharendu Dutt Vs King Emperor |
| C. | Barindra Kumar Ghosh vs King Emperor |
| D. | Kedarnath vs State of West Bengal |
| Answer» D. Kedarnath vs State of West Bengal | |
| 35. |
'Barindra Kumar Ghosh vs Samrat' is related to: |
| A. | from the principle of general intent |
| B. | with a general purpose |
| C. | by unlawful assembly |
| D. | by abetment |
| Answer» B. with a general purpose | |
| 36. |
The famous case on Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code is- |
| A. | McNaughton's case |
| B. | rex vs govinda |
| C. | Barindra Kumar Ghosh vs Emperor |
| D. | How. Matthew's case |
| Answer» D. How. Matthew's case | |
| 37. |
In which of the following cases did the Privy Council differentiate between 'common intention' and 'common intention'? |
| A. | Barindra Kumar Ghosh vs Emperor |
| B. | Mehboob Shah Vs King Emperor |
| C. | Srinivasamal Baroulia vs Emperor |
| D. | Bannamool vs Emperor |
| Answer» C. Srinivasamal Baroulia vs Emperor | |
| 38. |
The difference between 'common intention' and 'common intention' has been clarified in the following case- |
| A. | Barindrakumar Ghosh vs King Emperor |
| B. | Mehboob Shah Vs Emperor |
| C. | Srinivas MB vs Emperor |
| D. | all these |
| Answer» C. Srinivas MB vs Emperor | |
| 39. |
In which case did the court clarify the difference between common intention and common intention? |
| A. | Barindra Kumar Ghosh Vs Samrat |
| B. | Mehboob Shah Vs Samrat |
| C. | Kripal Singh Vs State of Uttar Pradesh |
| D. | Rishi Dev Pandey Vs Uttar Pradesh |
| Answer» C. Kripal Singh Vs State of Uttar Pradesh | |
| 40. |
I.V. NS. Which one of the following suits deals with the doctrine of joint liability created by section 34 of the IPC? |
| A. | queen vs talson |
| B. | rex vs govinda |
| C. | Mehboob Shah Vs Emperor |
| D. | R. vs lipman |
| Answer» D. R. vs lipman | |
| 41. |
A clear distinction between 'common intention' and 'like intent' was made in the following case- |
| A. | Barindra Kumar Ghosh vs King Emperor |
| B. | Mehboob Shah Vs Emperor |
| C. | Srinivas Mal vs King Emperor |
| D. | in all the above cases |
| Answer» C. Srinivas Mal vs King Emperor | |
| 42. |
Which one of the following cases is known as Indus river case? |
| A. | Dukhmohan Pandey case |
| B. | Mehboob Shah's case |
| C. | Barindra Kumar Ghosh's case |
| D. | Swarnim Singh Kumar Ghosh's case |
| Answer» C. Barindra Kumar Ghosh's case | |
| 43. |
The case of Mehboob Shah Vs Emperor is related to- |
| A. | with the same intent |
| B. | in general terms |
| C. | with a general purpose |
| D. | difference between (a) and (b) |
| Answer» C. with a general purpose | |
| 44. |
Which of the following matters is related to the principle of 'Joint Liability'? |
| A. | R vs Arnold |
| B. | Mehboob Shah Vs Emperor |
| C. | R. vs Haynes |
| D. | R. vs prince |
| Answer» C. R. vs Haynes | |
| 45. |
To prove the common intention, it is necessary to prove the 'Feast of the Dimargo'. It is stated that- |
| A. | In Aminullah Khan Vs Emperor |
| B. | in mirdad vs emperor |
| C. | In Mehboob Shah Vs Emperor |
| D. | none of the above |
| Answer» D. none of the above | |
| 46. |
Give the correct answer- |
| A. | on a conspiracy |
| B. | on common sense |
| C. | On faulty incarceration |
| D. | on common purpose |
| Answer» C. On faulty incarceration | |
| 47. |
Under which of the following cases was the principle of common intention discussed? |
| A. | Nanak Chand Vs State of Punjab |
| B. | K. M. Nanavati Vs. State of Maharashtra |
| C. | s. Varadarajan vs State of Madras |
| D. | Mehboob Shah Vs King Emperor |
| Answer» E. | |
| 48. |
Whereas a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of their common intention for all— |
| A. | each such person is responsible for that work |
| B. | Each of such persons is under the same liability for the act as if it were done by him alone. |
| C. | Each such person is liable according to his own fault |
| D. | none of the above is correct |
| Answer» C. Each such person is liable according to his own fault | |
| 49. |
When a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all of them, each of such persons is liable |
| A. | as if he alone had committed the criminal act |
| B. | for the part of the work done by him |
| C. | for abetment of such offense |
| D. | for conspiracy to commit such offense |
| Answer» B. for the part of the work done by him | |
| 50. |
Give the wrong answer: B.D. In order to attract the principle of joint liability under section 34 of the Code, the following is necessary: |
| A. | a criminal act |
| B. | criminal act committed by two or more persons |
| C. | The criminal act is committed by such persons in furtherance of the common intention of all, |
| D. | criminal act committed by at least five persons |
| Answer» E. | |