Explore topic-wise MCQs in Testing Subject.

This section includes 657 Mcqs, each offering curated multiple-choice questions to sharpen your Testing Subject knowledge and support exam preparation. Choose a topic below to get started.

1.

The question is whether such document is written by. Which of the following facts are relevant in this case?

A. Another document written by A is produced.
B. Opinions of experts on the question that both the documents were written by the same person.
C. Opinions of experts on the question that both the documents were written by different persons.
D. (B) and (C) both
Answer» E.
2.

'Opinion of another person' is not relevant for proving which of the following offenses under the Indian Penal Code, 1860?

A. धारा 302, 304 और 749
B. धारा 301, 302 और 498
C. धारा 302, 304 और 494
D. धारा 494, 495 497 और 498
Answer» E.
3.

Which of the following is not acceptable as evidence of opinion.

A. statement of a witness that an answer appears to be unlawful
B. opinion of a person who gives opinion to the court as to the script of another person
C. medical witness opinion
D. opinion of experts given in books when they are dead
Answer» B. opinion of a person who gives opinion to the court as to the script of another person
4.

Marriage took place according to a common practice. What is the rule to prove that it is a valid marriage bond?

A. practice will be done by evidence
B. Courts take judicial cognizance of practice
C. Court will assess the effect of the practice on the general public
D. all of the above
Answer» E.
5.

Answer with the help of code- handwriting can be proved 1. By the evidence of the author 2. By the opinion of the expert 3. By evidence of a person familiar with handwriting 4. Court under section 73 of the Evidence Act

A. केवल 1 एवं 2 सही हैं।
B. केवल 2,3 तथा 4 सही हैं।
C. केवल 1 एं 4 सही हैं।
D. 1,2 3 तथा 4 सही है।
Answer» E.
6.

A disputed interference can be proved-

A. by calling an expert
B. by examination of a person who is familiar with the handwriting of the author of the document concerned
C. By comparing accepted and disputed handwriting
D. by all of the above
Answer» E.
7.

Which of the following combination is not correctly matched? 1. Voluntary and direct confession of offense- Confession 2. Accused's confession of acquittal - when the accused with the confession is not being tried, it cannot be used against an accomplice. Expert opinion can be taken as correct answer with the help of code given below-

A. 1 और 2
B. 1 और 3
C. 3 और 4
D. 2 और 4
Answer» B. 1 और 3
8.

Which of the following is not a correct sum?

A. स्वीकृति की परिभाषा- धारा 17 साक्ष्य अधिनियम
B. विशेषज्ञ की परिभाषा- धारा 45 साक्ष्य अधिनियम
C. चरित्र की परिभाषा- धारा 55 साक्ष्य अधिनियम
D. सामान्य़ अधिकार व प्रथा- धारा 13 साक्ष्य अधिनियम
Answer» E.
9.

Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer using the codes given below the Lists-List-I---------------------- ---List-IIA.Section 46 Indian Evidence Act--------1. Opinion about digital signatureB.Section 47 Indian Evidence Act ----------2. Opinion as to right or practice when relevantC. Section 47A of the Indian Evidence Act---------3. Facts based on expert opinion D. Section 48 Indian Evidence Act----------4. Opinions about handwriting when relevant

A. A--B--C--Dn4--3--2--1
B. A--B--C--Dn1--2--3--4
C. A--B--C--Dn2--1--4--3
D. A--B--C--Dn3--4--1--2
Answer» E.
10.

The definition ofexpertis not given in section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872. So astudentcan also be an expert. This ideology was contested in which of the following issues:

A. प्यारे सिंह बनाम पंजाब राज्य, 1977 सु.को. में
B. Kanpur University was contested in which of the following cases:
C. मो. जाहिद बनाम उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य, 1999 सु. को. में
D. विष्णुबनाम राज्य, 2006 सु. को. में
Answer» C. मो. जाहिद बनाम उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य, 1999 सु. को. में
11.

Which one of the following sections of the Indian Evidence Act considers the opinion(s) about the existence of custom to be relevant?

A. धारा 47
B. धारा 48
C. धारा 49
D. धारा 50
Answer» C. धारा 49
12.

When are expert opinions relevant?

A. When science or art has to make court opinion on a matter
B. When deciding on uniqueness of handwriting or fingerprints
C. to form an opinion on a matter of foreign law
D. in all the above cases
Answer» E.
13.

Under which section of the Indian Evidence Act is the opinion of the examination of electronic evidence a relevant fact?

A. 45-A
B. 47-A
C. 65-A
D. 65-B
Answer» D. 65-B
14.

Who among the following is an expert under the Indian Evidence Act?

A. handwriting specialist
B. finger specialist
C. ballistics specialist
D. All of the above
Answer» E.
15.

A student can also be treated as an expert under section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872. It was propounded by the Supreme Court

A. भोगिनभाई हीरभाई बनाम गुजरात राज्य (1983 ) में
B. शंकरिया बनाम राजस्थान राज्य (1978) में
C. कानपुर विश्वविधालय बनाम समीर गुप्ता व अन्य (1983) में
D. पंजाब सिंह बनाम हरियाणा राज्य (1984) में
Answer» D. पंजाब सिंह बनाम हरियाणा राज्य (1984) में
16.

In which section of the Indian Evidence Act, DNA Is Grahame in Test Evidence?

A. धारा 47
B. धारा 45
C. धारा 48
D. धारा 49
Answer» C. धारा 48
17.

Opinions of experts are not consistent-

A. something about science
B. on something of art
C. on a matter of domestic law
D. About handwriting recognition
Answer» D. About handwriting recognition
18.

Evidence discovered by sniffer dogs comes under which category?

A. oral evidence
B. documentary evidence
C. follow-up evidence
D. scientific evidence
Answer» E.
19.

Opinions of other persons-

A. not compatible at all
B. is always compatible
C. Consistency depends on the discretion of the Court
D. Compatible with only a few things
Answer» E.
20.

In section 45 of the Evidence Law, the opinion of experts is relevant in the following matters-

A. Foreign method
B. on the subject of science or art
C. of handwriting or fingerprints
D. in all of the above
Answer» E.
21.

Expert opinion is relevant under which section of the Indian Evidence Act?

A. धारा 44
B. धारा 45
C. धारा 46
D. धारा 41
Answer» C. धारा 46
22.

The provisions relating to the relevance of expert evidence for the purposes of the Evidence Act are-

A. धारा 10 से 20 में
B. धारा 35 से 40 में
C. धारा 45 से 48 में
D. धारा 59 और 60 में
Answer» D. धारा 59 और 60 में
23.

Under section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, the opinion of an expert cannot be taken-

A. on foreign law
B. on science or art
C. on Indian law
D. on finger print
Answer» D. on finger print
24.

In which section of the Indian Evidence Act is the opinion of the third party relevant?

A. धारा 17
B. धारा 34
C. धारा 45
D. धारा 141
Answer» D. धारा 141
25.

The general rule is that the opinion or belief of the witness is not relevant. Certain exceptions to this rule have been laid down in the Indian Evidence Act. The sections giving these exceptions are-

A. धाराएं 52 से 55
B. धाराएं 15 से 17
C. धाराएं 6 से 9
D. धाराएं 45 से 51
Answer» E.
26.

'A' prosecutes 'B' for committing adultery with his wife 'C'. 'B' denies that 'C' is the wife of 'A'. But the court convicts 'B' of adultery. Thereafter, 'C' is prosecuted for having bigamy with 'B' during the lifetime of 'A'. How is 'C' never the wife of 'A'? Judgment against 'B'—

A. is inconsistent with 'c'
B. 'B' is relevant against
C. Not against 'B' and 'C'
D. is relevant against 'c'
Answer» B. 'B' is relevant against
27.

'B' is prosecuted by 'A' for stealing 'A''s cow. 'B' is convicted. Thereafter 'A' brings a suit against 'C' for the cow which 'B' had sold to 'C' before his conviction. Judgment against 'B':

A. Corresponding between 'A' and 'C'
B. The difference between 'A' and 'C' is
C. is without jurisdiction
D. There is conclusive evidence against 'C'
Answer» C. is without jurisdiction
28.

A prosecutes B for adultery with his wife C, B denies that C is A's wife, but the court convicts B of adultery. Thereafter, having married B during A's lifetime, C is prosecuted for bigamy. C says that she was never A's wife. Judgment given against B under Evidence Act against C

A. is inconsistent
B. are consistent
C. there is conclusive evidence
D. has the effect of contract
Answer» B. are consistent
29.

Judgments, orders or orders of a competent court-

A. There is never conclusive evidence of what he says
B. There is always conclusive proof of what he says
C. There is always conclusive evidence of what they say unless it is proved that they were obtained by fraud
D. What he says has conclusive evidence for certain matters and sometimes only relevant evidence but not conclusive evidence
Answer» E.
30.

Which of the following judgments is inconsistent with section 43 of the Evidence Act?

A. Insolvency court decision.
B. Marriage Court Decision.
C. Probate court decision.
D. Decision of the Criminal Court.
Answer» E.
31.

Which of the following is a universal decision?

A. Final decision after restitution of conjugal rights
B. Final decision in contempt suit
C. Final decision in divorce case
D. Final decision in case of breach of contract
Answer» D. Final decision in case of breach of contract
32.

'A' sues 'B' for trespassing on his land. 'B' asserts the existence of a public right of way on the land which 'A' denies. Existence of decree in favor of defendant in a suit by 'A' against 'C' for encroachment on the same land in which 'C' alleges existence of the same road

A. is relevant, but shall not apply as a stipulation
B. illogical, but worth considering
C. conclusive evidence that the right of way exists
D. relevant but not conclusive evidence that the right of way exists.
Answer» E.
33.

Which of the following types of jurisdiction is not mentioned in section 41 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872?

A. probate subject
B. periodic
C. insolvent
D. revenue related
Answer» E.
34.

Which of the following is a personal decision?

A. Final decision in with divorce
B. Final decision after restitution of conjugal rights
C. Final Decision After Bankruptcy
D. Final decision in authorization suit
Answer» C. Final Decision After Bankruptcy
35.

In the Evidence Act, 'prior justice' is relevant to—

A. धारा 40 में
B. धारा 41 में
C. धारा 42 में
D. is inconsistent
Answer» B. धारा 41 में
36.

B on A 1000 Rs. and shows the entries in his books of account showing B as indebted to him for the amount. under the evidence act

A. Those entries are relevant but not sufficient without other evidence to prove the debt.
B. Those entries are sufficient to prove the debt without any other evidence.
C. These entries are not relevant, but are sufficient without any other evidence to prove the debt.
D. These entries are neither relevant nor sufficient to prove the debt.
Answer» B. Those entries are sufficient to prove the debt without any other evidence.
37.

The principle of 'prejudicial justice' is provided in which of the following section of the Indian Evidence Law?

A. धारा 140
B. धारा 40
C. धारा 160
D. धारा 164
Answer» C. धारा 160
38.

Under which of the following sections of the Indian Evidence Act is the earlier decision relevant for the version of the second suit or consideration?

A. धारा 39
B. धारा 40
C. धारा 11
D. धारा 42
Answer» E.
39.

Which of the following sections of the Indian Evidence Act has been replaced by the Information Technology Act, 2000 in place of the old section?

A. धारा 39
B. धारा 22
C. धारा 47
D. धारा 65
Answer» B. धारा 22
40.

A paid Rs 1000 on B. and he showed B as indebted to him in his accounting diary. Such entry-

A. are not compatible
B. are consistent
C. It has no value in evidence
D. is rejected
Answer» C. It has no value in evidence
41.

Which one of the following sections of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 deals with the coherence of the statements of law contained in the books of law?

A. धारा 37
B. धारा 38
C. धारा 36
D. धारा 39
Answer» C. धारा 36
42.

Which of the following is related to when the entries in the books of advance are relevant?

A. R vs Govinda
B. Pakla Narayan Swami vs. King Emperor
C. Motisingh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
D. LK Advani vs CBI
Answer» E.
43.

In a suit, after the examination and cross-examination of a witness, the plaint is returned for production in a court of competent jurisdiction. Before the proceedings could begin in that court, the witness died. his testimony-

A. धारा 32 के अंतर्गत ग्राह्म है
B. धारा 33 के अंतर्गत ग्राह्म है
C. धारा 6 के अंतर्गत ग्राहम है
D. there is evidence in evidence
Answer» C. धारा 6 के अंतर्गत ग्राहम है
44.

Which of the following is correct for the date of birth of A?

A. A letter written by A's deceased father to a friend about A's birth is a relevant fact.
B. A letter written by A's deceased father to a friend about A's birth is not a relevant fact.
C. A letter written by A's deceased father to a friend in which A's birth was a cow is not acceptable in the evidence.
D. none of the above
Answer» B. A letter written by A's deceased father to a friend about A's birth is not a relevant fact.
45.

Which one of the following courts decided the case of Pakala Narayana Swamy vs King Emperor on 'death statement'?

A. Federal Court of India
B. privy council
C. Madras High Court
D. Supreme Court of India
Answer» C. Madras High Court
46.

Which of the following matters is directly related to Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act?

A. Pulkuri Kotaiya and others vs Emperor
B. Pakla Narayan Swami vs. Emperor
C. State of Maharashtra vs. Damu Gopinath Sindhe
D. Palwinder Kaur Vs State of Punjab
Answer» C. State of Maharashtra vs. Damu Gopinath Sindhe
47.

Which one of the following statements made by 'A' during his time after his death could be a relevant statement-

A. The house in which 'A' lives is the house of 'B'
B. 'A' has to take one thousand rupees from 'B'
C. 'B' defamed 'A'
D. The land that 'B' plows belongs to 'A'
Answer» B. 'A' has to take one thousand rupees from 'B'
48.

The case of Pakala Narayana Swamy Vs King Emperor is concerned with:

A. भारतीय साक्ष्य अदिनियम की धारा 6 से।
B. भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 21(1) से ।
C. भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 32(1) से।
D. भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 41 से।
Answer» D. भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 41 से।
49.

Adeath statementmay be-

A. Oral
B. written record
C. by any means of communication
D. all of the above
Answer» E.
50.

n order to constitute a confession under the Indian Evidence Act, it is necessary to either admit the allegation as an offense or admit all the Sarnath facts constituting the offence.The above view was expressed by the Privy Council in which of the following cases? was done?

A. John Mackin vs Attorney General
B. Pakla Larayan Swami vs. Emperor
C. H.H.B. Gill vs King Emperor
D. Q.E. vs. Abdullah
Answer» C. H.H.B. Gill vs King Emperor