MCQOPTIONS
Saved Bookmarks
MCQOPTIONS
This section includes 657 Mcqs, each offering curated multiple-choice questions to sharpen your Testing Subject knowledge and support exam preparation. Choose a topic below to get started.
| 1. |
Death statement recorded in the form of first information report by a police officer without obtaining a certificate of mental ability of the first information reporter. |
| A. | Cannot be considered a dying statement. |
| B. | Cannot be read in evidence. |
| C. | Can be considered a death sentence. |
| D. | Evidence cannot be accepted. |
| Answer» D. Evidence cannot be accepted. | |
| 2. |
The case of Pakala Nalayana Swamy vs Emperor is related to- |
| A. | from the principle of dissociation |
| B. | from accomplice |
| C. | from death statement |
| D. | cross-testing |
| Answer» D. cross-testing | |
| 3. |
A leaves from his house after telling his wife that P's wife had called him to get the payment of God. Two days later his decomposed body is found in a trunk. Statement given by 'A' to his wife in the trial of 'P' for the murder of 'A'- |
| A. | is insistent |
| B. | is partly |
| C. | No Graham, because there is no direct relation with A's death |
| D. | is acceptable because it is related to the circumstance of the transaction resulting in the death of A. |
| Answer» E. | |
| 4. |
Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer using the code given below the lists: List-I------------------------- --List-IIA.Death Statement--------1. State of Rajasthan Vs. Parthu B. Interested Witness ---------------2. Bhagga Vs State of Madhya PradeshC. Sanctions ---------------3 .Nishikant Vs. State of BiharD.Registration--------------------4.B.L. Sridhar vs K, M, Mharireddy |
| A. | A--B--C--Dn1--2--3--4 |
| B. | A--B--C--Dn4--3--2--1 |
| C. | A--B--C--Dn2--3--4--1 |
| D. | A--B--C--Dn3--4--1--2 |
| Answer» B. A--B--C--Dn4--3--2--1 | |
| 5. |
Where in the medical certificate of a married woman with a mortal deranged brain due to burns, she was declared not but physically fit. In which of the following cases did the court say that his assertion is not credible? |
| A. | Ravi Chandra Vs State of Punjab |
| B. | Shripatrao v. State of Maharashtra |
| C. | Uka Ram vs State of Rajasthan |
| D. | Baldev Raj vs State of Himachal Pradesh |
| Answer» B. Shripatrao v. State of Maharashtra | |
| 6. |
Under the following sections of the Indian Evidence Act, provisions have been made regarding the relevance of certain facts. Match List-I and List-II and select the correct answer with the help of code symbol-List-I--------------------------- List-II (Facts)----------------------(Section)A.Opinion of Handwriting Expert------------ ----1. 1.22B.Relevant ------2.47 Statement of fact made by a person who is dead or cannot be foundC.Previous good character in criminal matters-------3.22D.Content of documents About Verbal---4.53Acceptances |
| A. | A--B--C--Dn2--3--4--1 |
| B. | A--B--C--Dn3--1--2--4 |
| C. | A--B--C--Dn1--2--4--3 |
| D. | A--B--C--Dn4--1--3--2 |
| Answer» B. A--B--C--Dn3--1--2--4 | |
| 7. |
Queen Impress Vs Abdullah is an adjudication- |
| A. | Acceptance |
| B. | Acceptance |
| C. | Statement |
| D. | Death statement |
| Answer» E. | |
| 8. |
Which of the following cases is related to death declaration? |
| A. | Barindra Kumar Ghosh vs King Emperor |
| B. | Mehboob Shah Vs King Emperor |
| C. | R. vs telson |
| D. | Queen vs Abdullah |
| Answer» E. | |
| 9. |
Which one of the following cases is not related to 'Death Declaration'? |
| A. | Queen Empress vs Abdullah |
| B. | Pakala Narayana Swamy Vs King Emperor |
| C. | Zafar vs State of Uttar Pradesh |
| D. | Ratagond vs State of Bihar |
| Answer» D. Ratagond vs State of Bihar | |
| 10. |
Which one of the following matters is related to proclamation of death? |
| A. | Mehboob Shah Vs King Emperor |
| B. | Queen Impress vs Abdullah |
| C. | Kotaiya Vs King Emperor |
| D. | MC Burghese vs Ponen |
| Answer» C. Kotaiya Vs King Emperor | |
| 11. |
Which of the following is not necessary for a dying statement to be accepted in evidence? |
| A. | That such statement must relate to the cause of death of the doer. |
| B. | That the person making the statement was anticipating his death. |
| C. | That such statement was made in respect of any circumstance of that transaction. |
| D. | All of the above. |
| Answer» C. That such statement was made in respect of any circumstance of that transaction. | |
| 12. |
Death statement recorded in the form of first information letter by the police officer without obtaining the certificate of mental ability of the first information letter writer. |
| A. | Cannot be considered a dying statement. |
| B. | Cannot be read in evidence. |
| C. | Can be considered a death sentence. |
| D. | Evidence cannot be accepted. |
| Answer» D. Evidence cannot be accepted. | |
| 13. |
Before whom should a 'death statement' be made relevant under the Indian Evidence Act? |
| A. | magistrate |
| B. | Police officer |
| C. | doctor or private person |
| D. | Magistrate, Police Officer, Doctor or Private Person |
| Answer» E. | |
| 14. |
The format of death declaration is- |
| A. | unimportant (not significant) |
| B. | elemental (important) |
| C. | must be in writing only |
| D. | must be spoken only orally |
| Answer» B. elemental (important) | |
| 15. |
Kaushal Rao Vs Bombay State A, Ir. 1958 Su.Co. The suit of 22 is related to which subject of evidence law- |
| A. | with approval |
| B. | by acceptance |
| C. | from death statement |
| D. | consensually |
| Answer» D. consensually | |
| 16. |
Which of the following condition is not necessary for admissibility of dying declaration? |
| A. | death of narrator |
| B. | statement must be about his death |
| C. | The narrator was expected to die while making the statement. |
| D. | Statement made in respect of any circumstance of the transaction that resulted in his death |
| Answer» D. Statement made in respect of any circumstance of the transaction that resulted in his death | |
| 17. |
Statement of death is not admissible under the Indian Evidence Act, if- |
| A. | be related to the cause of death |
| B. | is related to any transaction of death |
| C. | In the opinion of the court the narrator is not competent |
| D. | none of the above |
| Answer» D. none of the above | |
| 18. |
Under section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the statement of a person who is dead is relevant— |
| A. | If it is in relation to the cause of death of any other person. |
| B. | If it is in relation to the cause of his own death or the death of any other person. |
| C. | If it is in relation to the cause of his own death. |
| D. | neither of the above |
| Answer» D. neither of the above | |
| 19. |
Which of the following is not related to 'Death Declaration'? |
| A. | Ratan Gond vs State of Bihar |
| B. | Pani Ben vs State of Gujarat |
| C. | Sitaram vs State of Uttar Pradesh |
| D. | Kaushal Rai Vs State of Gaharashtra |
| Answer» D. Kaushal Rai Vs State of Gaharashtra | |
| 20. |
A dying statement is inadmissible as evidence if it- |
| A. | is incomplete |
| B. | is oral |
| C. | recorded by police officer |
| D. | expressed by signs |
| Answer» B. is oral | |
| 21. |
About 6 months after his murder, he wrote a letter to the Superintendent of Police, Jabalpur. In which he had requested for protection, alleging that he feared injury from A and was in fear of his life. The letter is under section ------- |
| A. | 5 |
| B. | 6 |
| C. | 8 |
| D. | 32 |
| Answer» E. | |
| 22. |
Death statement - 1. Unconfirmed cannot be the sole basis of conviction. 2. A weak evidence 3. Equivalent to any other evidence 4. Reliability of it requires thorough review Select the correct answer with the help of the code given below - |
| A. | 1 और 4 |
| B. | 2और 3 |
| C. | 3 और 4 |
| D. | केवल 1 |
| Answer» D. केवल 1 | |
| 23. |
Under what one circumstance do you think a dying declaration is inadmissible in evidence? |
| A. | if it's verbal |
| B. | If it is indicated by mere signs |
| C. | If the person making the declaration has survived |
| D. | if it is confirmed |
| Answer» D. if it is confirmed | |
| 24. |
The statement of an injured person is recorded as a pre-death statement but if he survives, under which provision of the Indian Evidence Act is the said admissible? |
| A. | धारा 32(1) |
| B. | धारा 85 |
| C. | धारा 144 |
| D. | धारा 157 |
| Answer» E. | |
| 25. |
The declaration made in the course of business of the Indian Evidence Act 1872 is admissible- |
| A. | धारा 32(7) के अन्तर्गत |
| B. | धारा 32(2) के अन्तर्गत |
| C. | धारा 32( |
| D. | के अन्तर्गत4)धारा 32(1) के अन्तर्गत |
| Answer» C. धारा 32( | |
| 26. |
When a person dies after making a dying statement regarding his death, which of the following circumstances would make him inadmissible under section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act? |
| A. | The person who made the dying statement was a cow when he made the statement. Didn't know that he would die |
| B. | It was not done on oath |
| C. | That was done in a police report |
| D. | Under no circumstances in the above |
| Answer» E. | |
| 27. |
Assertion (A) : Death statement can be the ground of conviction. Reason (R) : Death statement should be made only in anticipation of death. |
| A. | (A) and (R) both are correct and (R) is the correct explanation of (A). |
| B. | (A) and (R) both are correct and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A). |
| C. | (A) is correct but (R) is wrong. |
| D. | (A) is wrong but (R) is correct. |
| Answer» D. (A) is wrong but (R) is correct. | |
| 28. |
In which of the following cases the adjudicating evidence is not admissible? |
| A. | Expressions of experts in treaties if the author is dead or cannot be traced. |
| B. | Where the eyewitness witness has told facts to any other person, the statement of that person. |
| C. | If the statement is a dead person, when it relates to the act of his death. |
| D. | If the statement is a part of the disputed transaction. |
| Answer» C. If the statement is a dead person, when it relates to the act of his death. | |
| 29. |
The accused's father did not support the prosecution's contention in the trial that he had told the witness that his son (accused) had done it. Sakshi's statement would be welcome- |
| A. | Of secondary evidence |
| B. | of evidence |
| C. | Of related facts and deeds |
| D. | none of the above |
| Answer» C. Of related facts and deeds | |
| 30. |
Statement of relevant fact made by a person who is dead or cannot be found, is relevant— |
| A. | only in practical matters |
| B. | only in criminal cases |
| C. | Neither in practice nor in criminal matters |
| D. | in both behavioral and criminal matters |
| Answer» E. | |
| 31. |
The 'death statement' is graham- |
| A. | only in civil cases |
| B. | only in criminal cases |
| C. | in civil and criminal matters |
| D. | depends on the circumstance |
| Answer» D. depends on the circumstance | |
| 32. |
Death statement (under section 32) admissible as evidence in the Evidence Act: |
| A. | only if it is recorded |
| B. | even if it is done to a police officer |
| C. | only when made to a magistrate |
| D. | only when it is done in the presence of a magistrate |
| Answer» B. even if it is done to a police officer | |
| 33. |
The following is not an exception to the rule of evidence: |
| A. | Death declaration |
| B. | Race Jeste |
| C. | expert opinion |
| D. | Acceptance |
| Answer» D. Acceptance | |
| 34. |
ppropriate evidence is not evidenceWhich of the following is an exception to the above rule of evidence? |
| A. | धारा 14 |
| B. | धारा 27 |
| C. | धारा 32 |
| D. | धारा 23 |
| Answer» D. धारा 23 | |
| 35. |
Statements of some persons without appearing in court are considered relevant in certain circumstances, as described in section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act. Which of the following is not included in this category? |
| A. | who can't get |
| B. | who have been unable to give evidence |
| C. | who is not willing to appear before the court |
| D. | whose presence cannot be without delay |
| Answer» D. whose presence cannot be without delay | |
| 36. |
Which provisions of the Evidence Act provide for exception to the rule of admissible evidence? |
| A. | धाराएँ 17 से 39 |
| B. | धाराएँ 32 से 33 |
| C. | धाराएँ 34 से 35 |
| D. | all the above clauses |
| Answer» C. धाराएँ 34 से 35 | |
| 37. |
In which section of the Indian Evidence Act is the provision of death declaration given? |
| A. | धारा 32(4) |
| B. | धारा 32(1) |
| C. | धारा 125 |
| D. | धारा 131 |
| Answer» C. धारा 125 | |
| 38. |
The modern view in Indian courts as to the relevance of thedeath statementis that- |
| A. | यह धारा 164 दण्ड प्रक्रियासंहिता 1973 के अधीन मजिस्ट्रेट के द्धारा अभिलिखित की जानी चीहिये। |
| B. | यह धारा 162 दण्ड प्रक्रिया सेहिता 1973 में पुलिस के सामनेअभिलिखित होनी चाहिये। |
| C. | It should be satisfied by other evidence. |
| D. | यह धारा 164 दण्ड प्रक्रिया संहिता 1973 में मजिस्ट्रेट के द्धारा अभिलिखित तथा अन्य साक्ष्यों से सम्पुष्ट की जानी चाहिये। |
| Answer» D. यह धारा 164 दण्ड प्रक्रिया संहिता 1973 में मजिस्ट्रेट के द्धारा अभिलिखित तथा अन्य साक्ष्यों से सम्पुष्ट की जानी चाहिये। | |
| 39. |
Which of the following is not correct? Statement of the person in section 32 would be relevant |
| A. | if he is dead |
| B. | if he can't get |
| C. | If he has been unable to give evidence |
| D. | This he does not want to come to give his statement |
| Answer» E. | |
| 40. |
Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act does not deal with— |
| A. | Statement as to the cause of his death by someone |
| B. | In respect of any circumstance of transaction which resulted in his death. |
| C. | the cause of death of that person is in question |
| D. | missing person |
| Answer» E. | |
| 41. |
Death statement is admissible under which section of the Indian Evidence Act? |
| A. | धारा 24 |
| B. | धारा 32 |
| C. | धारा 30 |
| D. | धारा 33 |
| Answer» C. धारा 30 | |
| 42. |
Acceptance and Confession: 1. There are exceptions to the evidence 2. The evidence is part of the evidence 3. There is coherent evidence 4. The evidence is included in the evidence Select the correct answer with the help of the code given below : |
| A. | 1,2 ओर 4 |
| B. | 1,3 और 4 |
| C. | 1 और 2 |
| D. | 2 |
| Answer» C. 1 और 2 | |
| 43. |
What is the verifiable significance of acceptance? |
| A. | Unimportant |
| B. | conclusive evidence |
| C. | as a clause |
| D. | binding |
| Answer» D. binding | |
| 44. |
Admissions - |
| A. | have conclusive evidence |
| B. | may be enforced as a clause. |
| C. | is always inconsistent. |
| D. | none of the above |
| Answer» C. is always inconsistent. | |
| 45. |
The confession of an accused is admissible evidence against a co-accused— |
| A. | If they have a joint trial for the same offence. |
| B. | If the said joint trial is for a separate offence. |
| C. | If they are tried for the same offence, but not jointly. |
| D. | If they are tried for separate offenses and not jointly. |
| Answer» B. If the said joint trial is for a separate offence. | |
| 46. |
Which one of the following four statements is correct? |
| A. | Acceptances are conclusive evidence. |
| B. | Acceptances only increase refutable presumptions. |
| C. | Acceptances are not evidence of accepted facts. |
| D. | Acceptances come into force in the form of a stipulation subject to certain provisions. |
| Answer» E. | |
| 47. |
'A' and 'B' are jointly tried for the murder of 'C'. Confession of 'B' now written long after the murder allegedly committed in pursuance of a conspiracy- |
| A. | There is no grace in the evidence |
| B. | धारा 10 के अंतर्गत साक्ष्य में ग्राह्म है |
| C. | धारा 30 के अंतर्गत साक्ष्य में ग्र्ह्म है |
| D. | धारा 10 एवं 30 के अंतर्गतसाक्ष्य मेंग्राह्म है |
| Answer» E. | |
| 48. |
In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that the confession of a co-accused is a very weak type of evidence and such a confession cannot be a ground for conviction- |
| A. | Nathu vs State of Uttar Pradesh |
| B. | Ra Prakash Vs State of Punjab |
| C. | Kashmira Singh vs State of Madhya Pradesh |
| D. | none of the above |
| Answer» D. none of the above | |
| 49. |
'B' is being tried for the murder of 'A'. 'C' said that 'B' and 'C' together killed 'A'. 'B' said in the court that 'B' and 'C' together killed 'A'. Which one of the following statements is false in this situation |
| A. | 'B''s confession can be tried against him |
| B. | The confession of 'B' cannot be considered in the trial against the subsequent 'C'. |
| C. | The confession of 'C' may be considered in the trial against 'B'. |
| D. | Conviction of 'C' may be considered in the trial against C |
| Answer» D. Conviction of 'C' may be considered in the trial against C | |
| 50. |
Statement- 'All acceptances are, but not all acceptances can be acceptances'. |
| A. | is false |
| B. | true |
| C. | partly false and partly true |
| D. | neither of the above |
| Answer» B. true | |