MCQOPTIONS
Saved Bookmarks
MCQOPTIONS
This section includes 657 Mcqs, each offering curated multiple-choice questions to sharpen your Testing Subject knowledge and support exam preparation. Choose a topic below to get started.
| 1. |
Which of the following is a relevant fact? A is tried for the murder of B. Facts that 1. B knew that A had killed C 2. B extorted money from A 3. B was married 4. B threatened to make A's information public known. Select the correct answer using the code given below - |
| A. | 1 और 4 |
| B. | 1 ,2 और 4 |
| C. | 1,2.3 और 4 |
| D. | 2 और 4 |
| Answer» C. 1,2.3 और 4 | |
| 2. |
Section 7 of the Evidence Act does not cover which of the following? |
| A. | to opportunity |
| B. | Of reason |
| C. | to the purpose |
| D. | to effect |
| Answer» D. to effect | |
| 3. |
The question to be considered is whether 'A' robbed 'B'. Which of the following statements is incorrect? |
| A. | 'B' had money in his pocket. This is a relevant fact. |
| B. | 'B' had given the rupees to A. This is a relevant fact. |
| C. | 'B told A's son that he had Rs. |
| D. | 'B told other persons that he had money is a relevant fact |
| Answer» E. | |
| 4. |
rm Malkani vs State of Maharashtra is related to which of the following? |
| A. | coherence of facts as to be part of the same transaction |
| B. | documentary evidence |
| C. | pointer question |
| D. | accomplice |
| Answer» B. documentary evidence | |
| 5. |
Which of the following facts is not relevant in a trial of murder of 'B' by 'A'? |
| A. | 'A' had fled immediately after killing 'B'. |
| B. | 'A' and 'B' were seen together before the murder. |
| C. | 'अ' ने 'ब' से 50,000 रुपया उधार लिए थे |
| D. | 'A' was in Bombay that day, while 'B' was murdered in Chennai. |
| Answer» E. | |
| 6. |
'A' is accused of waging war against the Government of India by participating in an armed uprising in which property is destroyed, the forces are attacked and the locks are opened. The occurrence of these facts is relevant even though 'A' may not have been present in all of them because- |
| A. | they constitute the cause of the relevant fact |
| B. | They show the preparation of relevant facts |
| C. | they are the result of relevant facts |
| D. | they are part of the ordinary transaction |
| Answer» E. | |
| 7. |
'A' is accused of murdering 'B' by beating him. Which of the following facts would be relevant? |
| A. | Whatever 'A' has said to 'B' |
| B. | What did the persons standing next to 'A' or 'B' say at the time of the beating? |
| C. | What 'A' has said to the persons standing near by a short time after the beating |
| D. | all of the above |
| Answer» E. | |
| 8. |
In which of the following provisions of the Indian Evidence Act the wordsbecoming part of the same transactionhave been used? |
| A. | धारा 5 में |
| B. | in stream |
| C. | धारा 11 में |
| D. | धारा 12 में |
| Answer» E. | |
| 9. |
The case of Sanvaldas Vs. State of Bihar is related to- |
| A. | by the rule of justice |
| B. | by the rule of the clause |
| C. | Elsewhere in the presence of the parent |
| D. | By the rule of race jeste (related facts and deeds) |
| Answer» E. | |
| 10. |
A wife had only seen a speeding vehicle which had crushed her speed at some distance. Didn't see the accident myself. The husband died of a heart attack a day later. Can the wife's evidence be taken as to what the injured husband told her after the accident? |
| A. | Yes, it's a death sentence |
| B. | No, it's just testimonial evidence |
| C. | No, because it is a privileged communication |
| D. | Yes, it's a part of race geste |
| Answer» E. | |
| 11. |
In which of the following cases the adjudicating evidence is not admissible- |
| A. | If the statement is a part of the disputed transaction |
| B. | If the statement is of a deceased person, when it relates to the cause of his death |
| C. | Where the eyewitness witness told the facts to any other person, the statement of that other person |
| D. | Expressed statements of experts in books, if author is dead or untraceable |
| Answer» D. Expressed statements of experts in books, if author is dead or untraceable | |
| 12. |
Facts which, notwithstanding anything in dispute, are so connected with any fact in dispute as to form part of the same transaction, whether they took place at the same time and place or at different times and places— |
| A. | Yes, it's a death sentence |
| B. | No, it's just testimonial evidence |
| C. | No, because it is a privileged communication |
| D. | Yes, it's a part of the race zeste |
| Answer» E. | |
| 13. |
Which section of the Evidence Act deals with facts and acts (race geste)? |
| A. | धारा 7 |
| B. | धारा 9 |
| C. | धारा 10 |
| D. | धारा 6 |
| Answer» E. | |
| 14. |
A wife had only seen a speeding vehicle which had crushed her husband at some distance, she had not witnessed the accident herself. The husband died of a heart attack a day later. Can the wife's evidence be taken as to what the injured husband told her after the accident? |
| A. | Yes, it's a death declaration |
| B. | No, it's just testimonial evidence |
| C. | No, because it is a privileged communication |
| D. | Yes, it's a part of the race zeste |
| Answer» E. | |
| 15. |
These facts, though not in dispute, are so linked to the facts in dispute that they form part of the same transaction and they- |
| A. | Relevant facts and actions are relevant under the principle |
| B. | are not compatible |
| C. | there is evidence |
| D. | primary evidence is |
| Answer» B. are not compatible | |
| 16. |
A number of facts relating to the same case in a particular way are relevant- |
| A. | साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 6 के अन्तर्गत |
| B. | साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 7 के अन्तर्गत |
| C. | साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 8 के अन्तर्गत |
| D. | साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 9 के अन्तर्गत |
| Answer» B. साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 7 के अन्तर्गत | |
| 17. |
In which of the following provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, the wordsbecoming part of the same transactionhave been used? |
| A. | धारा 5 में |
| B. | धारा 6 में |
| C. | धारा 11 में |
| D. | धारा 12 में |
| Answer» C. धारा 11 में | |
| 18. |
The facts which, though not in dispute, are so linked to the disputed facts that they form part of the same transaction and they- |
| A. | Relevant facts and actions are relevant under the principle |
| B. | are not compatible |
| C. | there is evidence |
| D. | primary evidence is |
| Answer» B. are not compatible | |
| 19. |
Which section of the Evidence Act deals with facts and acts (res geste)? |
| A. | धारा 7 |
| B. | धारा 9 |
| C. | धारा 10 |
| D. | धारा 6 |
| Answer» E. | |
| 20. |
Facts which, notwithstanding anything in dispute, are so connected with any fact in dispute as to form part of the same transaction, whether at the same time and place or at different times and places— |
| A. | is inconsistent |
| B. | are consistent |
| C. | partially compatible |
| D. | neither of the above |
| Answer» C. partially compatible | |
| 21. |
Facts which are so connected with another fact as to be part of the same fact, shall be said to be relevant facts, if- |
| A. | they happened at the same time |
| B. | they happened at different times |
| C. | (both a and B |
| D. | none of the above |
| Answer» D. none of the above | |
| 22. |
The relevance and admissible under the Indian Evidence Act is- |
| A. | synonyms |
| B. | neither synonymous nor synonymous |
| C. | Isosceles |
| D. | both synonymous and synonymous |
| Answer» C. Isosceles | |
| 23. |
The exception to the rule 'substantiated evidence is not admissible' is- |
| A. | धारा 9 साक्ष्य अधिनियम |
| B. | धारा 11 साक्ष्य अधिनियम |
| C. | Race Jeste |
| D. | All of the above |
| Answer» D. All of the above | |
| 24. |
The doctrine of res geste is inscribed in evidence |
| A. | धारा 4 में |
| B. | धारा 5 में |
| C. | धारा 6 में |
| D. | धारा 7 में |
| Answer» D. धारा 7 में | |
| 25. |
Race geste means the facts which are part of the same transaction, which is a disputed fact, prescribed in which section? |
| A. | धारा 6 |
| B. | धारा 7 |
| C. | धारा 5 |
| D. | धारा 8 |
| Answer» B. धारा 7 | |
| 26. |
In which provision of the Evidence Act the words 'to be part of the same transaction' have been used- |
| A. | धारा 5 के अन्तर्गत |
| B. | धारा 6 के अन्तर्गत |
| C. | धारा 7 के अन्तर्गत |
| D. | धारा 8 के अन्तर्गत |
| Answer» C. धारा 7 के अन्तर्गत | |
| 27. |
The principle of res geste (parts of the same transaction) of the Anglo-Law- |
| A. | no importance in india |
| B. | importance in india |
| C. | भारत में महत्व है और इसे भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम, 1872 की धारा 6 में समावेशित किया गया है |
| D. | भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम, 1872 की धारा 7 में समावेशित किया गया है |
| Answer» D. भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम, 1872 की धारा 7 में समावेशित किया गया है | |
| 28. |
The facts which are part of the same transaction are known as- |
| A. | please of alibi |
| B. | Death declaration |
| C. | Acceptance |
| D. | Race Jeste |
| Answer» E. | |
| 29. |
Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 the coherence of facts which are part of the same transaction is stated in which of the following sections? |
| A. | धारा 6 में |
| B. | धारा 7 में |
| C. | धारा 8 में |
| D. | धारा 11 में |
| Answer» B. धारा 7 में | |
| 30. |
In which of the following sections of the Indian Evidence Act, the principle of 'race geste' has been mentioned- |
| A. | धारा 5 में |
| B. | धारा 6 में |
| C. | धारा 7 में |
| D. | none of the above |
| Answer» C. धारा 7 में | |
| 31. |
Which of the following section of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 states that evidence may be given of disputed facts and relevant facts? |
| A. | धारा 3 |
| B. | धारा 4 |
| C. | धारा 5 |
| D. | धारा 60 |
| Answer» D. धारा 60 | |
| 32. |
According to section 5 of the Evidence Act, evidence can be given- |
| A. | of facts and relevant facts |
| B. | disputed facts only |
| C. | relevant facts only |
| D. | conflicting facts and partial |
| Answer» B. disputed facts only | |
| 33. |
If any evidence can be produced and has not been produced, the Court may presume that if it had been produced, that of the person being tried: |
| A. | would have been unfavourable |
| B. | would have suited |
| C. | would have been beneficial |
| D. | none of these |
| Answer» B. would have suited | |
| 34. |
Which of the following sections states that evidence of disputed facts can be given? |
| A. | धारा 3 |
| B. | धारा 4 |
| C. | धारा 5 |
| D. | धारा 6 |
| Answer» D. धारा 6 | |
| 35. |
Which of the following facts can be evidenced? |
| A. | which is a disputed fact |
| B. | which are relevant facts |
| C. | (both a and B |
| D. | none of the above |
| Answer» D. none of the above | |
| 36. |
The meaning of the phrase 'Ameniya Presumenter Right is Acta' is- |
| A. | proper determination of all facts |
| B. | All facts not properly determined |
| C. | taking all actions wrong |
| D. | not to be considered wrong of all actions |
| Answer» B. All facts not properly determined | |
| 37. |
'A' is tried for the murder of 'B' who kills him with a mace with the intention of killing him. Which of the following is not a disputed fact at the time of examination of 'A'? |
| A. | 'A' hitting 'B' with a mace |
| B. | 'A' talks to 'C' |
| C. | 'A' causing death of 'B' by mace |
| D. | Intent of 'A' to cause death of 'B' |
| Answer» C. 'A' causing death of 'B' by mace | |
| 38. |
Under which section of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 the expressions 'may presume', 'shall presume' and 'conclusive evidence' are interpreted? |
| A. | धारा 1 |
| B. | धारा 2 |
| C. | धारा 3 |
| D. | धारा 4 |
| Answer» E. | |
| 39. |
A fact that has neither been proved nor disproved is called? |
| A. | prove |
| B. | Nasabit |
| C. | not proven |
| D. | conclusive evidence |
| Answer» D. conclusive evidence | |
| 40. |
Which of the following words is not defined in the Indian Evidence Act? |
| A. | prove |
| B. | Imperfect |
| C. | not proven |
| D. | Nasabit |
| Answer» C. not proven | |
| 41. |
What is the definition ofnot provedin the Indian Evidence Act? |
| A. | A fact is said to be not proved when it has not been proved. |
| B. | A fact is said to be not proven when it has not been disproved. |
| C. | A fact is said to be not proved when it is neither proved nor disproved. |
| D. | none of the above |
| Answer» D. none of the above | |
| 42. |
Wherever it is special by the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 that the Court shall presume any fact, the Court shall determine such fact— |
| A. | Will be considered proved if and until then it is not disproved. |
| B. | shall be deemed to be proved if and until he is disproved, or shall demand proof thereof. |
| C. | will prove |
| D. | shall be deemed to be proved and shall not allow evidence to be given for the purpose of disproving the same. |
| Answer» D. shall be deemed to be proved and shall not allow evidence to be given for the purpose of disproving the same. | |
| 43. |
To be disproved of the facts means- |
| A. | that fact has not been proved |
| B. | that the fact has been proved |
| C. | that the existence of a fact is more likely |
| D. | that the court is confident that the fact does not exist |
| Answer» E. | |
| 44. |
Which of the following is not evidence under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872? |
| A. | Judge's personal knowledge and opinion of a case during the hearing |
| B. | silent witness statement |
| C. | Documents submitted for scrutiny of court |
| D. | electronic cd |
| Answer» B. silent witness statement | |
| 45. |
Tape recorded statement |
| A. | there is documentary evidence |
| B. | there is oral evidence |
| C. | (a) and (b) are both |
| D. | none of the above |
| Answer» B. there is oral evidence | |
| 46. |
vidence obtained by an undesirable law is admissible if it is otherwise relevant.The court said this: |
| A. | Pushpa Devi M. Jatia vs. M.L. Wadhwa |
| B. | Harprasad Vanam Shivdayal |
| C. | Kalpanath Rai Vs State of Maharashtra |
| D. | Ronnie vs State of Maharashtra |
| Answer» B. Harprasad Vanam Shivdayal | |
| 47. |
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 does not directly mention- |
| A. | of oral evidence |
| B. | of documentary evidence |
| C. | Of secondary evidence |
| D. | of circumstantial evidence |
| Answer» E. | |
| 48. |
If the court believes that the fact does not exist-means- |
| A. | prove |
| B. | Nasabit |
| C. | not proven |
| D. | all of the above |
| Answer» C. not proven | |
| 49. |
Give the wrong answer. Evidence can be of the following types- |
| A. | direct and indirect |
| B. | Primary and Secondary (Support) |
| C. | oral and documentary |
| D. | procedural and substantive |
| Answer» E. | |
| 50. |
rm Malkani v. State of Maharashtra (A.I.R. 1973 Su. 157) deals with the admissibility of |
| A. | tape recorded evidence |
| B. | police clearance |
| C. | expert opinion |
| D. | follow-up evidence |
| Answer» B. police clearance | |