1.

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question.Statement:A row is raging over Australia's warming-damaged Great Barrier Reef, with firms worried that scientists' apocalyptic warnings are scaring visitors out of the water. Every year, more than two million snorkel-wielding tourists head to Australia's famed coral ecosystem, generating revenues of $4.3 billion (Aus$5.9 billion) and supporting 64,000 local jobs.Which of the following arguments weaken the fear of the firms?Arguments:I. The Reef and Rainforest Research Centre recently published a markedly report, heralding "significant signs of recovery" at major dive sites around Cairns.II. Although government data shows that the number of visitors to the broader region has actually increased, those figures are older and don't include coral-viewing activities. III. Australians also appear divided on damage done to the reef. Only half of the country thinks that climate change is already causing the destruction of reef.

A. None is strong.
B. Only I and III are strong.
C. Only II and III are strong.
D. Only I is strong.
E. All are strong.
Answer» E. All are strong.


Discussion

No Comment Found