Secondary evidence is admissible: – McqOptions

MCQOPTIONS

1.	Secondary evidence is admissible:
A.	where the non-production of primary evidence has not been accounted for
B.	where the non-production of primary evidence has been accounted for
C.	irrespective of whether the non-production of primary evidence has been accounted for or not
D.	both (a) & (c) are correct.
Answer» C. irrespective of whether the non-production of primary evidence has been accounted for or not

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related MCQs

Presumption as to the genuineness of gazettes in electronic form has been dealt with under
Section 92 of Evidence Act prohibits admission of oral evidence, in respect of a written document, for the purpose of
The want or failure of consideration as contemplated under proviso 1 to section 92 of Evidence Act invalidating a document
Under section 92 of Evidence Act oral evidence to explain the real nature of the transaction is admissible
Extrinsic evidence to show the meaning or supply the defects in an instrument, is prohibited under section 93, in respect of
In criminal trials, the accused has to establish his plea mitigation or justification of an offence
A judgment in an election petition is not one of the judgments specifically recognised by
For presumption of death under section 108 of Evidence Act, the person is shown to be not heard for a period of
Privilege in respect of judges & magistrates under section 121 of Evidence Act relates to
Presumption as to the accuracy of maps 8: plans made by the authority of Government is contained in