Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.Statement : Should the parliamentary elections in India be held every three years as against five years at present? Arguments : I. No. This will enhance wastage of money and resources.II. Yes. This will help the voters to change non-performing representatives without much delay.III. No. The elected representatives will not have enough time to settle and concentrate on developmental activities.

Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by th

1.	Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.Statement : Should the parliamentary elections in India be held every three years as against five years at present? Arguments : I. No. This will enhance wastage of money and resources.II. Yes. This will help the voters to change non-performing representatives without much delay.III. No. The elected representatives will not have enough time to settle and concentrate on developmental activities.
A.	None is strong
B.	Only I and II are strong
C.	Only II and III are strong
D.	Only I and III are strong
E.	All are strong
Answer» E. All are strong

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related MCQs

Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.Statement : Should all the indirect taxes in India be combined into a single tax on all commodities?Arguments :I. Yes. This will considerably simplify the tax collection mechanism and the cost of collecting tax will also reduce.II. Yes. The manufacturers and traders will be benefited by this which in turn will boost tax collection.III. No. No other country has adopted such system.
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.Statement : Should India immediately stop digging coal from its mines?Arguments :I. Yes. The present stock of coal will not last long if we continue mining at the present rate.II. No. We do not have alternate energy source of sufficient quantity.III. No. This will put millions of people at a disadvantage and their lives will get adversely affected and also the industry.
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.Statement : Should there be only one university throughout India?Arguments :I. Yes. This is the only way to bring about uniformity in the educational standards.II. No. This is administratively impossible.III. Yes. This will make the degrees procured by students, comparable for offering jobs.
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.Statement : Should government established higher level Institutes of Technology (IIT's) be privatized?Arguments :I. Yes. Privatization will make these institutes financially healthy, competitive and quality conscious.II. Yes. Privatization is the key of the new era - can we survive without it?III. No. Standard of education of these institutes will fall.
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by four arguments I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.Statement : Should the consumption of aerated drinks be banned in India?Arguments :I. Yes. This is the only way to reduce the risk of exposing people to some diseases.II. No. Each individual should have right to choose what he wants.III. No. There is no confirmed evidence that such products have adverse effects on human body.IV. Yes. It is banned in many other countries also.
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.Statement : Should administrative officers be transferred after one or two years?Arguments :I. Yes. They get friendly with local people and are manipulated by them.II. No. By the time their policies and schemes start taking shape, they have to leave.III. No. This will create a lot of administrative hassles and cause a lot of inconvenience to the officers.
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.Statement : Should there be a total ban on tobacco products and smoking in India?Arguments :I. Yes. It is wrong to smoke away millions of money.II. No. It will throw thousands of workers in the tobacco industry out of employment.III. No. The government will lose huge amount of money as it will not earn by way of taxes on these products.
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.Statement : Should mercy death be legalized, i.e., all those who are suffering from terminal diseases be allowed to end their lives if they so desire?Arguments :I. No. Nobody should be allowed to end his/her life at his/her will as this goes against the basic tenets of humanity.II. Yes. Patients undergoing terrible suffering and having absolutely no chance of recovery should be liberated from suffering through mercy death.III. No. Even mercy death is a sort of killing and killing can never be legalized.
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by four arguments I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.Statement : Should children be prevented completely from watching television?Arguments :I. No. We get vital information regarding education through television.II. Yes. It hampers the study of children.III. Yes. Young children are misguided by certain programmes featuring sex and violence.IV. No. This is the only way to educate the masses.
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.Statement : Should the government ban all forms of protests including strikes and processions?Arguments :I. Yes. This is the only way to teach discipline to the employees.II. No. Government cannot deprive its citizens of their basic rights.III. Yes. This is the only way to ensure maximum productivity without disruption of work.

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related MCQs

Reply to Comment