Direction: Study the information below carefully. A number arrangement machine when given an input consisting of numbers arranges the numbers in a particular way until all the numbers are arranged in a specific order. Read the following steps of rearrangements. Input : 60 54 18 48 12 90 Step I : 60 90 54 12 18 48 Step II : 60 48 90 18 54 12 Step III : 60 12 48 54 90 18 Step IV : 60 18 12 90 48 54 Step V : 60 54 18 48 12 90 The step V is the final step. Identify the rule in above steps of rearrangement and hence answer the questions given below. What was the input if step IV is given below? Step IV: 30 60 70 20 50 40

Direction: Study the information below carefully. A number arrangement

1.	Direction: Study the information below carefully. A number arrangement machine when given an input consisting of numbers arranges the numbers in a particular way until all the numbers are arranged in a specific order. Read the following steps of rearrangements. Input : 60 54 18 48 12 90 Step I : 60 90 54 12 18 48 Step II : 60 48 90 18 54 12 Step III : 60 12 48 54 90 18 Step IV : 60 18 12 90 48 54 Step V : 60 54 18 48 12 90 The step V is the final step. Identify the rule in above steps of rearrangement and hence answer the questions given below. What was the input if step IV is given below? Step IV: 30 60 70 20 50 40
A.	30 70 50 40 20 60
B.	30 50 20 60 40 70
C.	30 20 40 70 60 50
D.	30 40 60 50 70 20
Answer» E.

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related MCQs

Directions: In each questions below are given three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read both of the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: I. All rings are fingers. II. Some ears are fingers. III. All ears are necklaces. Conclusions: I. Some necklaces are fingers. II. Some necklaces are rings.
In a certain code 'EDUCATION' is written as 'IGWDASGLJ. How is 'REASONING' written in that code?
Directions: In the following questions, the symbols @, ©, , % and # are used with the following meanings illustrated. 'p@q' means 'p is neither smaller than nor equal to q'. 'p#q' means 'p is not smaller than q". ?p©q' means "p is not greater than q'. 'p%q' means 'p is neither greater than nor equal to q'. 'pq,' means 'p is neither smaller than nor greater than q" In each of the following questions assuming the given statements to be true, find out which of the three conclusions I, II and III given below is/are definitely true. Statements: M#W, WN, N@B Conclusions: I. NM II. N%M III. M@B
Directions: In each questions below are given three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read both of the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: I. Some rings are bangles, II. Some bangles are tents. III. Some tents are skies. Conclusions: I. Some skies are bangles. II. Some tents are rings.
Directions: In each questions below are given three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read both of the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: I. All trees are ponds. II. Some ponds are fields. III. All fields are benches. Conclusions: I. Some benches are trees. II. No bench is tree.
Directions: In each question below are two statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: I. Some sweets are salt. II. No salt is spice. Conclusions: I. Some sweets are spice. II. No spice is salt.
Directions: In each question below are two statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: I. Some papers are plastics. II. All papers are clothes. Conclusions: I. Some plastics are clothes. II. Some plastics are papers.
Directions: In each question below are two statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: I. All planes are birds, II. All birds are clouds. Conclusions: I. Some planes are clouds, II. Some clouds are birds.
Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ?strong? argument is and which a ?weak? argument is. Statement: Should the railways in India be privatized in a phased manner like other public sector enterprises? Arguments: I. Yes. This is the only way to bring in competitiveness and provide better services to the public. II. No. This will pose a threat to the national security of our country as multinationals will enter into the fray.
Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ?strong? argument is and which a ?weak? argument is. Statement: Should there be a maximum limit for the number of ministers in the Central Government? Arguments: I. No. The political party in power should have the freedom to decide the number of ministers to be appointed. II. Yes. The number of ministers should be restricted to a certain percentage of the total number of seats in the parliament to avoid unnecessary expenditure.

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related MCQs

Reply to Comment