MCQOPTIONS
Saved Bookmarks
| 1. |
A and B entered into a contract, subject to the condition that in case the Senate will not concur in to the treaty, neither party will be liable. The Senate rejected it. Can A invoke force majeure or fortuitous event as a ground to exempt himself from liability? |
| A. | No, because it is not an act of God; |
| B. | Yes, because of the binding effect of contracts; |
| C. | Yes, because while the non-concurrence is foreseeable, it is beyond their control; |
| D. | Yes, because of the principle of liberty of contracts. (Philcomsat Corp. v. Globe Telecom, Inc. 25 May 2004; Sicam v. Jorge, 8 August 2007). |
| Answer» D. Yes, because of the principle of liberty of contracts. (Philcomsat Corp. v. Globe Telecom, Inc. 25 May 2004; Sicam v. Jorge, 8 August 2007). | |